sasha barkov
Registered User
- Nov 4, 2016
- 1,851
- 1,344
Rakell is only slightly older than Bobby was when we traded him. Ryan was entering the 4th year of a 5 year deal, and Rakell will be entering the 5th year of a 6 year deal. These are pretty similar situations, other than the fact that Bobby seemed unhappy for whatever reason.Lmao, what. Murray didn’t want to deal with Bobby and dealt him. He extended Rakell and seems him as a solid piece
Lmao, what. Murray didn’t want to deal with Bobby and dealt him. He extended Rakell and seems him as a solid piece
Murray gave an interview after the season was cancelled talking about how he had a really productive 2 and a half hour talk with Rakell about the state of the team and the season ending, and Rakell wore an A for a few games when I believe Manson and Fowler were both hurt (may have been Manson and Silf) so I think he is looked at as part of the leadership core on the team. I totally agree that his effort was lackluster a good chunk of the year, but I don't think that on-ice motor is as correlated with leadership in the room as fans sometimes think it is.
Loads of players wore letters last season, I wouldn’t read much into that (although I don’t actually recall ever seeing an A on Rakell, was that early or late in the year).
Silfverberg, Manson, Lindholm, Fowler and Henrique all wore As at different points of the season FWIW.
Rakell was never as good as Ryan at his best. His drop in numbers coincides with Getzlaf no longer being elite and as a result he’s being shuffled around the lineup more and it seems to be affecting his effort levels and consistency even more than normal.
Personally I think it’s time to move on. His effort level throughout the middle stage of the season when we needed him the most was pretty poor. Two years in a row it’s been after we are all but mathematically eliminated that he starts producing which has managed to salvage his season numbers somewhat.
This. I don’t care as much about the lack of production as the lack of giving a damn. That’s not what the kids need to be learning.Rakell was never as good as Ryan at his best. His drop in numbers coincides with Getzlaf no longer being elite and as a result he’s being shuffled around the lineup more and it seems to be affecting his effort levels and consistency even more than normal.
Personally I think it’s time to move on. His effort level throughout the middle stage of the season when we needed him the most was pretty poor. Two years in a row it’s been after we are all but mathematically eliminated that he starts producing which has managed to salvage his season numbers somewhat.
If we can get a mid first and a decent prospect, I say we for sure should trade him. Seems to be a lot of good players there, this year could be huge for the future.
If a mid first will turn out what he is, we're happy.
And he'll be 30 before before we're good again.
Rakell is the Garret Anderson of the Anaheim Ducks. One of the few knocks on GA with the Anaheim Angels was that he was Lazy and made no effort to chase down balls in the OF and would only slowly jog to 1B on a possible infield hit instead of running. His personality was also like what ur saying too but it worked in MLB because its not a heavy cardio sport like NHL.I think his personality comes across as not being as competitive as some fans would like. He seems ripe for a change. I would trade him he would fit nicely on a team looking for a role player he comes across as being a guy that might be happy to play in Sweden if it wasn't for the $ that he is making in the USA.