strictlyrandy
Registered User
If the Avs break up that top line, they deserve to fold. You keep that line together and ride or die with them.
They actually split it up tonight.
If the Avs break up that top line, they deserve to fold. You keep that line together and ride or die with them.
Trying to get away from Barkov. I don't think it'll happen again next game.They actually split it up tonight.
Barkov is a special player man. He disrupted that top line better than anyone has this year imo.
Barkov is a special player man. He disrupted that top line better than anyone has this year imo.
Yah he did. Loungo was the main reason, but Barkov was amazing. I've never seen MacKinnon struggle to gain the zone on the PP as much as I did tonight. If the Avs split up MacKinnon and Rantanen, you know he's all over them.Barkov is a special player man. He disrupted that top line better than anyone has this year imo.
If the Avs break up that top line, they deserve to fold. You keep that line together and ride or die with them.
Yup , because Raantanen with 86pts in 69 games for a 102pts pace CLEARLY sucks.And that's why asking questions like these after 22 games into the season is not a good idea.
He was clearly the best player at the moment, no shame stating that.And that's why asking questions like these after 22 games into the season is not a good idea.
This was the response when I said all it takes is a cold 10 games to be taken out of the Art Ross race. Some fans don't appreciate what guys like McDavid and Crosby do every year. It's so hard to be elite for 82 games.Sure, but it's highly unlikely to happen without an injury.
Attention to detail. Read the thread title again.Yup , because Raantanen with 86pts in 69 games for a 102pts pace CLEARLY sucks.
No, he wasn't. He was leading the league in points after 22 games. Not the same thing.He was clearly the best player at the moment, no shame stating that.
There's a difference between not sucking and being the best player in the world.Yup , because Raantanen with 86pts in 69 games for a 102pts pace CLEARLY sucks.
90% of the time the best player at the moment tends to lead the league in goals. If not, then we can pick and choose who the best player was when McDavid was leading the NHL in points too.No, he wasn't. He was leading the league in points after 22 games. Not the same thing.
After 22 games into a season, luck can be a huge factor. The point is that it is too premature to proclaim someone best in the league after a sample of 22 games.90% of the time the best player at the moment tends to lead the league in goals. If not, then we can pick and choose who the best player was when McDavid was leading the NHL in points too.
Attention to detail. Read the thread title again.
Actually, Laine was with 5 goals in 1 game. (The day the thread was made). But yeah, Rantannen was leading the league in points.He was that particular moment...
"At the moment". No need to go for revisionist history. Rantanen not being the best right now doesn't change his status when the question was askedAnd that's why asking questions like these after 22 games into the season is not a good idea.
After game 22 he went on to score 22 points in 13 games. it wasn’t just 22 games it was half the season.After 22 games into a season, luck can be a huge factor. The point is that it is too premature to proclaim someone best in the league after a sample of 22 games.
Exactly. How long is a moment?Actually, Laine was with 5 goals in 1 game. (The day the thread was made). But yeah, Rantannen was leading the league in points.
I said it's highly unlikely. Also, McDavid isn't in the Ross race anymore, either.This was the response when I said all it takes is a cold 10 games to be taken out of the Art Ross race. Some fans don't appreciate what guys like McDavid and Crosby do every year. It's so hard to be elite for 82 games.
Rantanen is well under a point per game since Christmas.
Yup , because Raantanen with 86pts in 69 games for a 102pts pace CLEARLY sucks.
1. It wasn't highly unlikely. It was very predictable, and the prediction came true.I said it's highly unlikely. Also, McDavid isn't in the Ross race anymore, either.
What happened was highly unlikely. Which is what I said. Stop wasting my time.