robertmac43
Forever 43!
- Mar 31, 2015
- 23,357
- 15,454
They were both awesome when they played on their own lines. Having them together is just a cheat code at this point.
I think of Marner as a Backstrom and Matthews as Ovechkin.
Personally I prefer Marner with Tavares. Marner and Matthews compliment each other very well and have proven to be incredible players independently and are more than capable of driving a top line.
I mean so has Tavares so...
Outside of the fact that he was completely snake bitten 5-on-5 in terms of goal scoring, Tavares has easily been one of the best all-around centers in the league this year.
I agree ...and the reasons for me is that Marner's pass first mentality can stifle opportunities because opponents try to eliminate the pass and dont worry too much about Marner's shot, with Nylander, he can shoot as well as he can make a cross zone pass, so, he needs to pull a defender away from Matthews.Personally I prefer Marner with Tavares. Marner and Matthews compliment each other very well and have proven to be incredible players independently and are more than capable of driving a top line.
They were both awesome when they played on their own lines. Having them together is just a cheat code at this point.
I don't believe that "Marner just ain't that special w/o Matthews", but they're not equally valuable or important, so I picked the former despite the poor wording.
Keep in mind for all that Marner sets up Matthews beyond what, say, Nylander would be capable of, he still struggles to finish his own chances. Is Matthews a great or even very good playmaker? It's hard to say when he usually plays with guys who struggle to score from the ranges he does himself with ease.
It's a top 5 passer in the game with the best goal scorer, they both help one another to create one of the best duos in hockey
"struggles" to finish his own chances? Really? (18 goals in 50 games)
Comparing his ability to make other players better to ... Nylander? (where did Tavares' 47 goal pace go, against a weaker North division?!?)
Yeesh.
I'm not sure about "one of the best all-around" but he's been great and I'm happy with what he brings everyday so I have no complaints. I just prefer Marner with Tavares b/c it gives us 2 guys who are capable of scoring 40. Don't get me wrong, Marner & Matthews is so fun to watch, my personal preference is the balance but I'm also sitting at home vs coaching so....
18 goals in 52 games, 3 of which are ENG. That's a 24-goal pace over 82 games while averaging more TOI than any forward but McDavid. So what part of what I said is wrong? Is he actually a great goal scorer? No, Marner still has a weak shot with a slow release. He has great hands and puck control instead.
Yes, I compared Marner's playmaking ability to Nylander's and said it was better. No shit. What part of that are you actually disagreeing with? Of course Tavares would probably be putting up more points if he played with Marner full time. Tavares' shooting rates and % have both gone down significantly in the last couple of seasons, but conversely, his assist rates are going up slightly, so go figure.
Tavares asked to be put in front of the net. ...quick hands/releaseHe has one of the highest faceoff percentages in the league, 13th for centers in terms of assists, 20th in goals (in spite of his snake bitten start of the season), and well-above average defensively this year too. He is no Matthews, MacKinnon, McDavid, etc. but he has quietly and consistently been amazing all year and if he was ES goals like he normally does (and has now been doing for almost a month now), he would be given a ton of praise right now. Same if we had a non-anemic PP that actually uses him for more than a high slot screen.
He came out with a bang in his first year here because how can you not notice a guy who puts up 47 goals, but he is one of the most consistent guys I have ever seen while also being arguably the least flashy superstar in the league. That can make him go unnoticed.
Marner averages 4 mins more per game than Tavares, and 6 more than Nylander, and they are 1 and 2 goals behind.Marner has more goals than Tavares and Nylander, facts.
He's 2nd on the team in goal scoring.
So I continue to question your statement about him being somehow deficient for goal scoring . . . not his forte obviously; but he's pretty darn good at it still. Better than Tavares and Nylander this year, both considered solid goal scorers.
I am not going to read through the whole thread, but you must be mentally deficient, to use the more PC term - to have voted "Marner needs Matthews to be great" choice.
(both are great players btw, regardless of who they play with)
Marner has already proved otherwise.
90 point season without Matthews, giving a veteran superstar (Tavares) 47 goals, his highest total ever despite the fact he's on the downslope from his prime that year.
The best Matthews did without Marner (other than the pp, which they've always been on together) is . . . 40, in his rookie year. He was basically on that same pace next 2 years, then when Babs got fired his next year, switched to Marner. Instant huge uptick.
All evidence points to the OPPOSITE being true, in fact - that Matthews is only a "good" superstar without Marner, and with Marner, is a Hart candidate and Rocket winner.
Discuss.
Now take out the penalty killMarner averages 4 mins more per game than Tavares, and 6 more than Nylander, and they are 1 and 2 goals behind.
Marner is not an elite NHL scorer and never has been, Tavares is, and Nylander is also a better scorer then Marner over their careers.
Marner gets the most opportunity of any player on the team to shoot on net, and if he had even an above average shot, he'd be a 30+ goal scorer every year. ...its something he can still develop, as it is better this year, but, too inconsistent
That makes to much sense get out of here lolNow take out the penalty kill