deckercky
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2010
- 9,379
- 2,452
Touché lol, but McDavid’s #s are from a single run where he looked better than the #s IMO...nowhere near his typical level and not as good as Drae...but again it’s a much smaller sample that isn’t yet significant enough to read anything from.
This is Kucherov's first poor playoffs, and is based upon a 3 game sample size (where he still put up 2 pts). Over the previous 62 playoff games, Kucherov had established himself as a very good playoff performer. Playoffs should be considered a strength for Kucherov, not negative, in terms of evaluating him as a player.