You're not wrong about any of this. My desire roster turnover is twofold for bigger players and different attitude. It is kinda hard to not reference Scotty (62 wins and all) but he could do anything he wanted because Yzerman couldn't be shook. Not by his coach, press, previous reputation of failure or playing on one freaking leg. He is the definition of iron will. Stamkos does not strike me as that kind of person. I don't know who he is behind closed doors but the stereotypical "aw shucks" attitude that is sometimes attributed to Canadians seems real with him and I seriously wonder how he'd handle a guy like Tortorella clamping down on him. I'm ad libbing based on the one rant I've actually seen but I wouldn't be surprised if Torts would probably point to him during the 2nd intermission of an ass whooping and say "This is what you're all playing like. Like ****ing ****! Steven! Get yourself and your team ready to play! Do your job captain! Or do I use the term loosely? Show me you're better than this. I know you are! But do you? ****ing figure it out!!" So much of the reason I want a change in captaincy is because I honestly don't know how Stamkos would hold up to that and I can't prove Cooper doesn't just chew gum and say "aw shucks" between lashes like that one. I hope he doesn't because that means Cooper isn't reaching his team.
You're mistaken on Yzerman not being shook. Yzerman credits Bowman for his change into a two-way player. Pierre McGuire tells a story about Bowman shaming an unnamed player (who's clearly Yzerman) in front of his teammates, basically saying he played for personal stats more than team wins, and that was the catalyst for Yzerman being the iron-willed guy you're talking about. But that's not to say you're wrong--just clearing up that one thing. As good as those Red Wings teams were, Bowman's role can't be understated. He took a group of star players and made them play like cogs in a machine.
But yeah, Stamkos doesn't seem to be that guy. But comparing anybody in the league to Yzerman when it comes to will and determination just isn't fair. Detroit's trainer in those days said something along the lines of Yzerman not feeling pain the way a normal human does, because he shouldn't have been able to play through injuries like he did, and as well as he did, and his teammates always took inspiration from that. (More than a few of them have talked about how you couldn't in good conscience watch Yzerman come into a lockerroom on crutches, lace up skates, and then not go out and give 100% yourself.)
But that's why Yzerman was a top player in history. Stamkos, Kucherov, Point, and on and on, all have the opportunity/potential to go down as top players, but it won't have to be based on something so strange as pain tolerance. But I mean, this is why I think a lot of the criticism of Stamkos is unfair, because they don't realize Yzerman's leadership, same with a lot of "great" leaders, wasn't about screaming at his team. Everybody just assumes all great captains must have a little Mark Messier in them, but I don't think that's true. Leadership comes in different forms, and there's no better example of that than Yzerman.
Maybe this team does need somebody to scream at them. I've always thought there's still a place in the league for a hard@$$ coach, especially when you're dealing with star players. Maybe it even needs a new captain--Stamkos was made captain at 24, and I think we all thought he would grow into the role, but he's not a guy who looks like a leader on the ice, even when he's playing well.
Based on what I heard, stuff like was another day in the office for Scotty. He had the captain he needed to succeed in Detroit becuase Yzerman answered by dominating. I'm not certain about Cooper any more than I am Stamkos now. We could get bigger up front but if Stamkos keeps playing like a scolded dog it isn't gonna mean much. I'm very disheartened by everyone's performance.
When Stamkos scored in Game 4, it kind of disheartened me, because it felt like a frustration goal. He beat two players on his own and then fired a shot top shelf. Great individual efforts are nice, but not a recipe for success.
I don't need to know people are yelling to be happy. I need to know this group grasps the fact that their window will close in a few years and their prime years will go with it. The only assumption I'm comfortable in making is that the team gave Cooper an endorsement because I don't think he'd be here if they had not.
I think sometimes we fans underestimate just how much players care. This is a thing they've dedicated their lives to. Many of them took less money to play in TB for the chance to win. It just always seems to me when fans are questioning effort level, it's usually based on how many pucks are going in, or how well things are going for a team.
The players may well have given Cooper an endorsement. Or maybe they didn't. I just think the optics of a rookie GM firing a 62 win coach were too much for JB to swallow, so he's going to be a little more patient with it. I mean, yeah, those of us who believe coaching is, and has been, a major problem for this team, aren't going to be happy with it. But the hockey world outside of TB, even if they believe Coop underperformed, would likely be shocked if he were fired after tying an NHL record in the regular season.
It's troubling to me that Todd Richards had to go in and fix both of our special teams while Cooper has been here the entire time. I can only imagine what that means for the 5v5 system, especially when coming up against a trap. Washington really did write the blueprint on how to beat us, or maybe even Babcock back in 2015.