Is Gordie Howe Overrated?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
Gordie Howe. By far!

His greatness lies in his seemingly never-ending career. If he retired 15 years earlier nobody would even mention him in any top list. Not to mention he peaked in the 50s when nobody could even play hockey (or any sport really).

The true big 4 is:

Gretzky
Orr
Lemieux
Hasek

I know Canadian extremists will get mad but yes, there are non Canadians in the top 10.

I hope you don't ban me because I am not trolling, this post is dead serious.
 

Habsfan18

The Hockey Library
May 13, 2003
30,614
8,625
Ontario
“In the 50’s when nobody could even play hockey.”

Now that’s an ignorant statement that shows a complete lack of knowledge and respect for the history of the game.

I don’t want to come across as too harsh here, but I seriously suggest you do some proper research before you make statements such as this. We’re all entitled to our own opinions but this just seems baseless and it’s as if you’re trying to get a rise out of people.

And I suppose you succeeded with me at least, so good job. :laugh:
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
Gordie Howe is still a top 4 player all time whether he retires at 36 or 51.
>played in a non-international league with 6 teams when hockey was 10 times less competitive
>still didn't get higher PPG during his peak years than many many players who played in way more competitive eras
Lmao!
 
Last edited:

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
“In the 50’s when nobody could even play hockey.”

Now that’s an ignorant statement that shows a complete lack of knowledge and respect for the history of the game.

I don’t want to come across as too harsh here, but I seriously suggest you do some proper research before you make statements such as this. We’re all entitled to our own opinions but this just seems baseless and it’s as if you’re trying to get a rise out of people.

And I suppose you succeeded with me at least, so good job. :laugh:
Sports weren't taken very seriously back then. Come on! All of us played some sport when we were kids. Do you think people born in the 20s/30s had the same opportunities? All sports have their legends, it is the same with Pele. He on the other hand at least had insane stats for his time. He is still quite overrated tbh.

Look at Bobrov. Outscored Kharlamov by a mile while playing 'pro' football. Sports were a joke back then. One thing I have to give huge props to Howe for is that he kept improving and had amazing genetics which allowed him to play at such age.
 

Bear of Bad News

Your Third or Fourth Favorite HFBoards Admin
Sep 27, 2005
13,345
26,517
If you'd like to be taken seriously, please try to post in a more serious fashion.

Ignoring the content, your posts "read" as trolling. "Canadian extremists", "Lmao!", "I am not trolling"...they don't read like a serious poster.

No offense.
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
I am in my mid 20s. It does not matter though to be honest. Even Jagr said that the game has gotten a lot harder since the 90s and the 90s were extremely competitive! All the top Eastern Bloc talents came in, not to mention Swedish/Finnish/American all got quite good by then.
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
If you'd like to be taken seriously, please try to post in a more serious fashion.

Ignoring the content, your posts "read" as trolling. "Canadian extremists", "Lmao!", "I am not trolling"...they don't read like a serious poster.

No offense.
Well I have been browsing this site for a while now and kept seeing things like:

Makarov is top 60
Jagr isn't in the top 25
Naming 5 goaltenders better than Hasek
Saying Tretiak would not even make the top 10 most legendary goaltenders
etc.

I think 'Canadian extremist' is an appropriate term here.
 

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
28,424
37,656
Alright, we have your thesis. Now what is the argument and evidence to back it up?

I'll entertain your assertion if there's data behind it (i.e. his production relative to his peers, or something indicating his last decade was just compiling, etc). Upon what do you rest your case?
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
Alright, we have your thesis. Now what is the argument and evidence to back it up?

I'll entertain your assertion if there's data behind it (i.e. his production relative to his peers, or something indicating his last decade was just compiling, etc). Upon what do you rest your case?
I already did. His scoring wasn't top4, not to mention he played in an era where creating a substantial gap in skill was way easier due to poor training. Look at Gretzky. Even in the 80s training was sub-par (compared to today), so he stood out even more so due to his super talent.

Why do you think I don't think he belongs there? It is obviously the stats! Howe never truly stood out, not even in the noncompetitive 50s.
 

Habsfan18

The Hockey Library
May 13, 2003
30,614
8,625
Ontario
Howe never truly stood out in the 50’s?

5 Hart’s, 5 Art Ross trophies, and 4x leading the NHL in goals says otherwise. Also 7x a first team All-Star.

Gordie Howe more or less WAS the 50’s along with Maurice Richard and Jean Beliveau.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrhockey193195

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
Howe never truly stood out in the 50’s?

5 Hart’s, 5 Art Ross trophies, and 4x leading the NHL in goals says otherwise. Also 7x a first team All-Star.

Gordie Howe more or less WAS the 50’s along with Maurice Richard and Jean Beliveau.
These trophies don't mean that much today. There were 6 teams for god's sake. No international players. How can these guys compare to the modern day stars? By standing out I meant having a significant gap between him and the rest of the field. Nobody got even close to Gretzky besides Lemieux in the 80s.
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
How exactly does one quantify a sport’s competitiveness, and it’s multipliers?
You shouldn't take everything literally. But really, can anyone look up the number of registered Canadian players for the 50s(or 60s/70s)? Obviously a sport gets more competitive the more people compete in it. A child needs to train a lot more today than in the 40s to make it into the NHL.
 

Bear of Bad News

Your Third or Fourth Favorite HFBoards Admin
Sep 27, 2005
13,345
26,517
can anyone look up the number of registered Canadian players for the 50s(or 60s/70s)? Obviously a sport gets more competitive the more people compete in it. A child needs to train a lot more today than in the 40s to make it into the NHL.

Here, we've reached an interesting topic (and it seems like the crux of your thesis is the competition level for Howe versus other stars). Can we proceed along these lines?
 

quoipourquoi

Goaltender
Jan 26, 2009
10,123
4,126
Hockeytown, MI
These trophies don't mean that much today. There were 6 teams for god's sake. No international players. How can these guys compare to the modern day stars? By standing out I meant having a significant gap between him and the rest of the field. Nobody got even close to Gretzky besides Lemieux in the 80s.

So scoring 1.24 points-per-game for 4 seasons from 1951-1954 when the next best player is at 0.94 isn't a significant gap?
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,206
17,561
Connecticut
These trophies don't mean that much today. There were 6 teams for god's sake. No international players. How can these guys compare to the modern day stars? By standing out I meant having a significant gap between him and the rest of the field. Nobody got even close to Gretzky besides Lemieux in the 80s.

In the early 50's Howe's gap over the field was 2nd only to Gretzky's in the history of the game.
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,213
507
So scoring 1.24 points-per-game for 4 seasons from 1951-1954 when the next best player is at 0.94 isn't a significant gap?
Sure it is a decent gap, though 1.24 isn't that extremely impressive (for a top4 ever).

1970-71 (1st and 2nd statistically best defense)
Orr - 1.78 PPG (+124)
Tremblay - 0.82 PPG (+16)

1981-82
Gretzky - 2.75
Coffey - 1.58

These are really insane differences.

How is Howe better than Hasek?
2274026a7c45faea6b448afdb028a684.png

be1d45abe003e7a9029f36a8ab60c4cb

Gyazo - be1d45abe003e7a9029f36a8ab60c4cb.png
be1d45abe003e7a9029f36a8ab60c4cb
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,206
17,561
Connecticut
Gordie Howe. By far!

His greatness lies in his seemingly never-ending career. If he retired 15 years earlier nobody would even mention him in any top list. Not to mention he peaked in the 50s when nobody could even play hockey (or any sport really).

The true big 4 is:

Gretzky
Orr
Lemieux
Hasek

I know Canadian extremists will get mad but yes, there are non Canadians in the top 10.

I hope you don't ban me because I am not trolling, this post is dead serious.

Come on, nobody can be this ignorant about the game.
 

canucks4ever

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
3,997
67
These trophies don't mean that much today. There were 6 teams for god's sake. No international players. How can these guys compare to the modern day stars? By standing out I meant having a significant gap between him and the rest of the field. Nobody got even close to Gretzky besides Lemieux in the 80s.
I do agree with you to an extent. Back then in the 1950's and 1960's, there weren't any elite hockey players from BC, the Maritimes and the United States, let alone foreign europeans. 85% of the overall talent pool back then was simply Ontario and Quebec. The overall talent pool of registered hockey players was minuscule. If Gordie Howe was playing today I have doubts he would be considered a notch above Crosby, Ovechkin and Mcdavid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->