His NHL numbers are pretty great, actually. In 11 games last season, he went 5-4-1 with a 2.61 GAA and a .924 SV%. He's not even a kid - he's older than Walker, Moore, Roy, Amadio, Kempe, Grundstrom, Lizotte, and Wagner.
Riemer has been pretty good hasn’t he? San Jose seems logical tho.LA have goaltending back up in Peterson but in their current state, a solid back up is probably the least of their priorities.
It would make absolutely no sense to trade Campbell in a deal for mid round picks and then pay more for Georgiev.
Carolina and San Jose may be your teams to make a play for Georgiev.
that was the only bad goal he let in. Weird play he lost his stick. Campbell didnt look bad last night but also didn’t look amazing.Again...skip ahead to 5:34 and tell me Campbell isn't better than this. I will again state...this play happened 34 seconds after the Leafs scored to make it 3-2.
Here's the thing, that play came right after the Leafs had gotten back into it..like 34 seconds after. The guy just never seemed able to make the save when he had to.that was the only bad goal he let in. Weird play he lost his stick. Campbell didnt look bad last night but also didn’t look amazing.
Georgiev looks like a complete goof. It honestly makes me like him more as a player now.Georgiev has better numbers and played way more games
Cal Petersen Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com
Alexandar Georgiev Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com
Lol...he looks like a combination of James Reimer and Stiffler in that pic.Georgiev looks like a complete goof. It honestly makes me like him more as a player now.
My 2 picks, if the Rangers deal him, would be Wings or Sabres. Both need a starter.Riemer has been pretty good hasn’t he? San Jose seems logical tho.
Well Petersen is playing tonight and let’s just say they might be in play for Georgiev after all.As a Ranger fan I would love to have LA as a bidder for Georgiev but if I were them I would at least give Peterson a shot as this season winds down. Georgiev might not be dealt before the summer anyway.
Lol after one game? Hell using that logic, why would the Kings want Georgiev after his last two horrible starts?Well Petersen is playing tonight and let’s just say they might be in play for Georgiev after all.
Well Petersen is playing tonight and let’s just say they might be in play for Georgiev after all.
Well Petersen is playing tonight and let’s just say they might be in play for Georgiev after all.
Outside of the Jones trade, which happened in the offseason, when has a team given up a first/quality players for a young goalie on the verge of being a starter?lol. kings arent giving up a 1st or Kempe+ for a goalie so no