Is catching Gretzky in goals enough for Ovechkin to surpass Crosby?

If Ovechkin passes Gretzky, is he greater than Crosby?


  • Total voters
    393

HockeySniper

Registered User
May 13, 2018
223
99
In terms of what? Overall game? If that’s the case Gretzky isn’t the best player of all time
 

KoozNetsOff 92

Hala Madrid
Apr 6, 2016
8,567
8,229
Crosby had 15 goals and 31 points and played defense.
Ovechkin had 15 goals and 27 points and didn't play defense.

How is Ovechkin's Smythe Run (which should have gone to Evgeny Kuznetsov) better? That is ridiculous.

I said OV's smythe run was better than either of Crosby's, which were 16 & 17, not 09. And if you think Kuznetsov should have won the smythe because he had more pts then you must also agree that Crosby should have zero smythes as he never had the most pts in the pens cup runs.
 

Hatfield

Registered User
Jan 27, 2007
1,101
1,092
I don't think Ovechkin could ever beat the record "as a compiler". He's already the best goal scorer of his generation, has lead the league is scoring numerous times, routinely topping 50 goals.

Gretzky set the record as a less-than-productive goal scorer in his late career. He scored 38 goals the year he broke Howe's record, and that was actually the last time he even scored more than 30.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
How is Mike Gartner having more goals than someone relevant at all? He's not #1, and if he was - yeah I think he'd probably be remembered as better than either Messier or Yzerman.

My point is IF Ovie gets to 895, then he will be looked at by future generations (that's the part I don't think you're focusing on enough here) as the better player. That is assuming Crosby's point totals are in the Dionne range, which I feel is entirely fair. If Ovie falls short, then I don't think any of this applies.


I don't think he makes it either but still your premise doesn't work historically.

NHL Progressive Leaders and Records for Goals | Hockey-Reference.com

the 3rd column has the leader all time in NHL goals.

Cy Denney, Nels Stewart and even Maurice Richard who held the #1 spot all before Howe were never considered the greatest players of all time or even in their respective careers were they?

Maybe Richard from the 40's to 1960 but even then it's extremely debatable.

When people look at things like who was the better of greater player, most of them can distinguish more than simple counting stats.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
was not referring to malkin directly helping Crosby. Im saying his team doesn't keep advancing to the next round each year giving him more opportunities to accumulate points without malkin. not going to look it up but the years only 1 of them was there pitt didn't do well in the playoffs.

Still at some point you have to acknowledge that Crosby has been the best playoff performer post lockout.

A guy just doesn't lead the field in points and PPG like Crosby does because of team effects.

83 times since the lockout a player has scored 19 points or more in the playoffs and Crosby has done it 6 times.

He also leads the field in total points and PPG by quite a large margin.

To say that anyone else has been a better playoff performer since the lockout just doesn't hold water.

Player Season Finder | Hockey-Reference.com

The chances of Ovechkin changing that are basically slim to none.
 

psycat

Registered User
Oct 25, 2016
3,239
1,149
One guy will likely have stats slightly worse than Marcel Dionne, and the other will be #1 all-time in goals. Who do you think future generations will 'remember' more?

WE might know Crosby was the better player for a longer period, but the history books won't show it that way if Ovie scores 895+

Also know that Ovechkin, in the factual world, peaked higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KevinRedkey

Randyne

Registered User
May 20, 2012
1,171
1,877
OV is already better. Crosby is grossly overrated due to the Canadian factor.
Possibly the weakest argument ever in this debate.
He is absolutely right though:
The Canadian media prefer Crosby three times more than Ovechkin:
0wBW524.jpg


But worldwide YouTube audience prefer Ovechkin:
JNqLAri.jpg
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
He is absolutely right though:
The Canadian media prefer Crosby three times more than Ovechkin:
0wBW524.jpg


But worldwide YouTube audience prefer Ovechkin:
JNqLAri.jpg


A youtube search, really?

Take a look at the top youtube searches and the word trivial (just like the argument being made) comes to mind.

As for the first table you posted a guy who has been the much better playoff and international player is going to get more written about him, unless of course you except the hockey (or any media) to write about what Ovechkin is doing while crosby is playing in the SC playoffs right?

Just for fun I googled both players respective injuries and Crosby has 400,000 more results for his injuries, obviously the Canadian factor at play and nothing else right?:sarcasm:

I stand by my original post on this, just a really weak and sad excuse for an argument.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,409
10,436
One guy will likely have stats slightly worse than Marcel Dionne, and the other will be #1 all-time in goals. Who do you think future generations will 'remember' more?

WE might know Crosby was the better player for a longer period, but the history books won't show it that way if Ovie scores 895+

Pretty sure it will since the fact that the majority thought Crosby was better during and will directly after their careers will not be lost, not sure how you think it would be?
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,409
10,436
In terms of what? Overall game? If that’s the case Gretzky isn’t the best player of all time

Crosby has scored more points in a season. Their points per game in their best periods of time whether it be half, 1-3 seasons etc. are nearly dead even and career goes to Crosby easily. He is and has been a better defensive player as well with more playoff points in total and on a per game basis, even though that is largely out of Ovechkin's control. It's not the same thing at all.
 
Last edited:

Randyne

Registered User
May 20, 2012
1,171
1,877
As for the first table you posted a guy who has been the much better playoff and international player is going to get more written about him, unless of course you except the hockey (or any media) to write about what Ovechkin is doing while crosby is playing in the SC playoffs right?
Here is the table from 2018 (Ovi's cup):
o06ely9.jpg

Even then Sid mentioned 2 times more in the Canadian media (Ovechkin peaked only once).

And youtubers far more objective as always:
dwFSnCp.jpg
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
Here is the table from 2018 (Ovi's cup):
o06ely9.jpg

Even then Sid mentioned 2 times more in the Canadian media (Ovechkin peaked only once).

And youtubers far more objective as always:
dwFSnCp.jpg

The weak argument continues again, youtubers are looking for highlights not indicating on which player is better or not.

I guess if Ovechkin was canadian he would have won more awards right?:sarcasm:
 

Randyne

Registered User
May 20, 2012
1,171
1,877
The weak argument continues again, youtubers are looking for highlights not indicating on which player is better or not.
I guess if Ovechkin was canadian he would have won more awards right?:sarcasm:
Ovechkin already has 6 more awards, but the Canadian media makes Crosby greater than he is.
You are right youtubers watching highlights and Ovechkin's entire career is highlight.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
Ovechkin already has 6 more awards, but the Canadian media makes Crosby greater than he is.
You are right youtubers watching highlights and Ovechkin's entire career is highlight.


Thank you for making my point.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,491
10,046
Ovechkin already has 6 more awards, but the Canadian media makes Crosby greater than he is.
You are right youtubers watching highlights and Ovechkin's entire career is highlight.
.

Another demonstration of favoritism is the Canadian dominated hockey media nominated Crosby as a top 3 player twice more than the players (7-5) whereas the players nominated Ovechkin as a top 3 player more than the media (6-5).

So basically the media is more pro Crosby than the players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ALLCAPSALLTHETIME

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
.

Another demonstration of favoritism is the Canadian dominated hockey media nominated Crosby as a top 3 player twice more than the players (7-5) whereas the players nominated Ovechkin as a top 3 player more than the media (6-5).

So basically the media is more pro Crosby than the players.


So 7-5 compared to 6-5 is some kind of Canadian media bias?

I guess so since you think that Crosby is anything defensively compared to Ovechkin but I digress and lets keep the facts out of a conspiracy narrative shall we.
 

ALLCAPSALLTHETIME

Great Dane! Love that Eller feller.
Oct 10, 2009
9,234
4,898
British Columbia, Canada
The Canadian media is definitely pro Crosby.

Living in Canada, as I do, it has been apparent from day 1.

They have an agenda and a narrative to push.

If Ovie was Canadian, it'd be non-stop Ovie coverage, guaranteed.

It is what it is.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,491
10,046
So 7-5 compared to 6-5 is some kind of Canadian media bias?

It's not 7-5 vs 6-5. That would be a difference of 1 event.

It's 7-5 vs 5-6 (media vs players)

So the media bumped Crosby up twice and Ovechkin down once compared to the players. It's a difference of three events.
 

Thenameless

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
3,854
1,788
It's not 7-5 vs 6-5. That would be a difference of 1 event.

It's 7-5 vs 5-6 (media vs players)

So the media bumped Crosby up twice and Ovechkin down once compared to the players. It's a difference of three events.

So, either way it's close, with Crosby being injured for some of his best years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

HockeySniper

Registered User
May 13, 2018
223
99
Crosby has scored more points in a season. Their points per game in their best periods of time whether it be half, 1-3 seasons etc. are nearly dead even and career goes to Crosby easily. He is and has been a better defensive player as well with more playoff points in total and on a per game basis, even though that is largely out of Ovechkin's control. It's not the same thing at all.
Different players with different roles and cast. It’s hard to compare. And Crosby has also what 40 more games played in playoffs
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,247
10,126
It's not 7-5 vs 6-5. That would be a difference of 1 event.

It's 7-5 vs 5-6 (media vs players)

So the media bumped Crosby up twice and Ovechkin down once compared to the players. It's a difference of three events.


Still fail to see any Canadian media bias here as the 2 awards (Lindsay and Hart) have different criteria right?

Either way using full season awards to view a whole picture in which one player has 4 seasons out of 14 as complete ones doesn't tell the entire story as we have already covered.

When Ovechkin isn't an elite scorer it's because his play wasn't elite that season, when Crosby isn't an elite counting stats scorer overall it's because of injuries not a drop in play.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->