Last season O'Reilly had 20 pts in 29 games, Duchene had 43 in 47 and Parenteau had 43 in 48 ... plus I forgot Landeksog is a hell of a talent
O'Reilly is having a career year so far. He hadn't come close to this type of production in previous years.
Duchene had 43 in 47 last year. The year before, he had 28 in 58. My point is that we have young players with talent just like these guys; it's a matter of surrounding them with the right guys and things going right.
Landeskog had a sophmore slump, himself, last year (17 in 36) after a great rookie year. We could (hopefully) be talking about Huberdeau the same way next year.
Even Erik Johnson who you mentioned before for the d-core was reaching "bust" status before the year. He had a lot to prove before this year and he did. Just last year, he had 4 points in 31 games. Kulikov and Gudbranson will have to prove that they can take their game(s) to the next level for us to improve. Can at least one of them do it? Those are questions we need answered just like Colorado needed them answered before this year.
Paranteau was brought in as a free agent and is not really a big reason why they are where they are this year. He has 33 points in 53 games this year. We have plenty of guys who can produce at such a rate and we'll probably sign a free agent or two who can do that too.
I feel like both teams were/are built with a core group of young forwards with skill (we've been scoring more recently with the added skill to the lineup), a suspect defense and good goaltending that was brought in via trade in the case of both teams. Varlamov is a big reason for Colorado's improvement. Hopefully Luongo will provide that same type of goaltending and stability which would give our young guys more confidence to be creative offensively.
No situation is exactly the same obviously, but there are similarities.