MXD
Original #4
- Oct 27, 2005
- 50,793
- 16,535
No. This is round 1, and there's at very least 12 games left to play (realistically, closer to 20).
So, 4 : Not Tainted At All.
So, 4 : Not Tainted At All.
Just as tainted as the 3 cups gifted to Pittsburgh.
Officially: "Series supervisor Don VanMassenhoven said the major penalty was given because the cross-check caused a significant injury."
A penalty that would have been only 2, became a 5 minute major, because it caused a significant injury. It isn't rocket surgery. Minor penalties that cause significant injuries become majors.
I know people are emotional right now, but saying this is a "bad call" seems to be trying to work Eakin's intent into this. Eakin didn't mean for Pavelski to be that badly injured, obviously. But his minor yet obvious infraction became a major because it caused a significant injury (official wording).
Some are suggesting everyone fall down and act injured at every minor penalty then, if that is how the rule is - but there is already a penalty for that - it is called diving or embellishment. Pavelski was not embellishing.
As the other poll shows, about 90% of the posters agree that Eakin should not have gotten a major penalty (I wholeheartedly agree).
If the Sharks go on to win the Cup (which they probably won’t)...
People are acting like a major penalty is an automatic three or four goals against. I’m super impressed the sharks pulled it off, 99/100 times a team scores one or something and still lose.
Not tainted at all. Not a major, and a bad call, but let’s recognize the pure INSANITY that is scoring four goals on a five minute major.