maxpowers
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2006
- 140
- 0
Hey, sorry if this is one of those thread topics that pops up every few months, but I was wondering how everyone here thinks Orr would have done if he played forward instead of defence?
His career highs were 46 goals, 102 assists, and 139 points. He won the Art Ross twice. If he was a forward for his full career how would these stats and his awards be affected?
Also how do you think the Bruins would have done, could they have won more than 2 cups in that time.
I personally think that as a defender Orr was able to play more minutes and prevent goals as well as score them and was probably a more effective player because of this. Since he was given relatively free reign around the ice his point totals may not significantly increase in a position change to forward.
Thoughts?
His career highs were 46 goals, 102 assists, and 139 points. He won the Art Ross twice. If he was a forward for his full career how would these stats and his awards be affected?
Also how do you think the Bruins would have done, could they have won more than 2 cups in that time.
I personally think that as a defender Orr was able to play more minutes and prevent goals as well as score them and was probably a more effective player because of this. Since he was given relatively free reign around the ice his point totals may not significantly increase in a position change to forward.
Thoughts?