Proposal: I WANT TANEV!!!!! (TOR/VAN)

[Spirit of 67]

The Canucks need d prospects.

I would do Lilidgren and a 2nd.

For Tanev

Gives Toronto some stability. They lost to Boston because of bad d.

Gives the Canucks another d prospect which they desperately need.

Tanev would not have helped against Boston. Literally at all.

 

[Spirit of 67]

Ya but if the leafs trade their 1st this year and San Jose's 2nd for Tanev they wouldn't have any picks until their very late third rounder.

Ah. I see

 

[bukwas]

How ‘bout just bumping one of the 37 other threads.
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again, we need a moratorium on these.

Agreed.
It's the same posters saying the same things in the ones i've looked at.

 

[rent free]

Sure add a 1st+2nd

no thanks

 

[Canucks LB]

I'm not giving up Kapanen for Tanev.

Kapanen has a real chance to break out into a real fast top6 winger with grit. Hes a great piece to hold onto.

I'm all over giving up 1st rounder, how about taking brown? Hes a good very good player, but IMHO has been skipped over by Johansen(the young kid we brought up at the end of the year) and Kapenen.

1st 2018+brown for Tanev?

I would do it

 

[Qwijibo]

Tanev for 2018 1st + 2019 1st.

Tanev is not worth two 1st’s. Come on now.

 

[Hunter368]

Just curious from both a Leafs & Nucks fans pov what do you think KK projects to become at the nhl level?

Leafs fans?

Nucks fans?

Please give me your projection. Thx

 

[TS Quint]

I've just kind of accepted the Canuck fan narrative that Tanev is a great dman who has had some unlucky injury problems. But for the first time I started to dig into his stats and I don' get it. Nothing about him seems all that good. He doesn' play big minutes, he doesn' put up big points, his corsi sucks. Am i looking in the wrong place? I mean for a "premier shut down guy" his shot supression isnt all that good.

All I can see is a guy who in the right situation would-be a good 4D. So I'm guessing there is something to the eye test.

Tell me Canucks fans, what makes Tanev so valuable?

 

[Deadly Dogma]

I say 1st+Rasanen+3rd for Tanev and the Benning 2nd lol

 

[Deadly Dogma]

Just curious from both a Leafs & Nucks fans pov what do you think KK projects to become at the nhl level?

Leafs fans?

Nucks fans?

Please give me your projection. Thx

My opinion is he has the potential to hit 60 points at least once in his career but he should be a 50+/- point winger who can play the pk and pp. Has amazing speed down the wing and a decent shot tho he takes a lil while to get it off. He has the stick skills to pull dekes but his raw agility is a lil low.

 

[Strangelove]

Tanev is not worth two 1st’s. Come on now.

Yes he is well worth 2 late 1st's.

Especially in a thread entitled " I WANT TANEV!!!!! "

 

[Frankie Blueberries]

Ya but if the leafs trade their 1st this year and San Jose's 2nd for Tanev they wouldn't have any picks until their very late third rounder.

That's usually what happens when teams make trades that make them Cup contenders. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

 

[Canadian Canuck]

Yes he is well worth 2 late 1st's.

Especially in a thread entitled " I WANT TANEV!!!!! "

Agreed. Worth more than Hamonic but his injury history lowers his value. Two very late firsts for Tanev is very fair.

 

[Mathew Barzal]

Just curious from both a Leafs & Nucks fans pov what do you think KK projects to become at the nhl level?

Leafs fans?

Nucks fans?

Please give me your projection. Thx

I'd hazard a guess at a 2nd/3rd line tweener. Probably hovers at a 40-50 point average over his peak years. Keep in mind all I know about him is what's been talked about in these threads.

I've just kind of accepted the Canuck fan narrative that Tanev is a great dman who has had some unlucky injury problems. But for the first time I started to dig into his stats and I don' get it. Nothing about him seems all that good. He doesn' play big minutes, he doesn' put up big points, his corsi sucks. Am i looking in the wrong place? I mean for a "premier shut down guy" his shot supression isnt all that good.

All I can see is a guy who in the right situation would-be a good 4D. So I'm guessing there is something to the eye test.

Tell me Canucks fans, what makes Tanev so valuable?

Work ethic and situational awareness.

Admittedly, Tanev doesn't have a lot of 'natural talent' so he can't get by on coasting through games and throwing up numbers here and there. He simply is a work horse in the defensive end, a lot of the time throwing himself into shots and taking beatings along the boards most players wouldn't do in the regular season. That's half the reason he's injured so often.

He's a model player for Don Cherry's "good ol' Canadian kid" award.

 

[LeafGrief]

Just curious from both a Leafs & Nucks fans pov what do you think KK projects to become at the nhl level?

Leafs fans?

Nucks fans?

Please give me your projection. Thx

At a dead minimum, he is a capable bottom sixer who is a reliable breakaway threat on the PK and can chip in some offense at 5on5. He has Grabner/Byron speed and will be able to use it to score plenty of goals at the NHL level. In terms of upside, he's a top6 winger who is a threat on the PP, PK, and at evens due to his incredible speed and good shot. He's not a high IQ player, but he could use his feet and capable hands to put up 25 goals and 50 points consistently. Ideally, he would be the third piece on a talented line where he uses his speed and breakaway threat to force opposing defenders to cover him more tightly and therefore create space for his other linemates.

 

[Mancesco Franquilini]

I've just kind of accepted the Canuck fan narrative that Tanev is a great dman who has had some unlucky injury problems. But for the first time I started to dig into his stats and I don' get it. Nothing about him seems all that good. He doesn' play big minutes, he doesn' put up big points, his corsi sucks. Am i looking in the wrong place? I mean for a "premier shut down guy" his shot supression isnt all that good.

All I can see is a guy who in the right situation would-be a good 4D. So I'm guessing there is something to the eye test.

Tell me Canucks fans, what makes Tanev so valuable?

This literally just came out showing that Tanev is the best amongst his peers at Shot Surpression

Where are you getting your info from?

 

[Cleetus]

Tanev for 2018 1st + 2019 1st.

lmao really... 2 first round picks for a injury prone d-man. keep him for that.

 

[Star67]

I will throw this out there:

Toronto
Tanev
Sutter @50% (Leafs could use a3C)

Vancouver
1st 2018
2nd 2018
2nd 2019
Carrick/Bracco/Rosen

This is a good offer, Vancouver should take this.

 

[Mancesco Franquilini]

This is a good offer, Vancouver should take this.

I'd agree the Value is there, but apparently Vancouver has been getting called the most on Sutter this offseason and last season.

I'd probably deal them separately to maximize the return on both. We don't have many assets we can trade that are actually attractive, we can't afford to "throw" anybody in, especially if we have to retain salary.

 

[Strangelove]

lmao really... 2 first round picks for a injury prone d-man. keep him for that.

lmao really... 2 late first round picks is fair value. Continue with that shoddy defense if you prefer.

 

[Disappointed EP40]

I will throw this out there:

Toronto
Tanev
Sutter @50% (Leafs could use a3C)

Vancouver
1st 2018
2nd 2018
2nd 2019
Carrick/Bracco/Rosen

Sooooooold !

Come on down and collect your prize.

 

[Disappointed EP40]

Vancouver fan totally fine with the OP offer or that other offer of 1st, 2nd and misc.

 

[Walt22]

A 22 year old top nine player and a 1st is a bad return? What?

Who is the top 9 player?

 

[Brobust]

Kapanen or the 1st. Not both.

Also no need to waste a roster spot on Cassels.

 

[Cogburn]

I will throw this out there:

Toronto
Tanev
Sutter @50% (Leafs could use a3C)

Vancouver
1st 2018
2nd 2018
2nd 2019
Carrick/Bracco/Rosen

Drop Sutter and your prospect, and I still don't shoot this down. Dont tamper with the classics.