I have no idea how, but I just won the Stanley Cup

Elvs

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
12,285
4,667
Sweden
I've played NHL games since 1999, and never won the Stanley Cup with a team nearly as bad (on paper) as this one.

Because I like a challenge in franchise mode, I started one with the Columbus Blue Jackets (NHL 22). I was gonna prepare a rebuild, but the team somehow snuck into the playoffs (4th seed in the metro) and, despite much adversity, went on to win the Stanley Cup.

Lineup:
Nyquist (83) - Jenner (84) - Bjorkstrand (83) +2
Voracek (84) - Sillinger (79) - Sanford (79) +2
Robinson (80) - Roslovic (82) - Texier (81) 0
Johnston (77) - Kuraly (80) - Studenic (77) 0

Gavrikov (84) - Boqvist (82) +2
Werenski (88) - Pysyk (79) +1
Bean (83) - Sustr (78) +2

Merzlikins (85)
Korpisalo (79)

Rules:
* All star difficulity
* Always playing locked position (I like the gameplay better this way)
* I played every 10th game or so in the regular season, simmed the rest.
* In the playoffs, I can only play game 1, 4 and 7. Rest must be simmed.

Road to the cup:
Beat Carolina 4-3
Beat New Jersey 4-0
Beat Toronto 4-2
Beat St. Louis 4-1

Okay, now you might wonder, where is Laine? Let me tell you, he got injured two games into the postseason. Out until august. The following game, Andrew Peeke (81) would go down the same path.

If that wasn't bad enough, Elvis Merzlikins missed the first six games in the opening round against Carolina, and only came back (played injured) in game 7. Voracek also missed three games in this series.

On top of it all, I accidently simmed too many games. So despite the series going to game 7, I only played two of the games when I was actually allowed to play three.

What else? Werenski didn't record a point until the 9th game of the playoffs. The commentators made sure to bring up his drought.

Furthermore, Boqvist and Robinson both missed the two last games of the conference finals, as well as the first game of the finals.

And in every series, the opponent had home ice advantage.

So how could I win the Stanley Cup with this roster and under these rules and conditions? I have no idea. Somehow, the AI went absolutely nuts, both in the games I simmed and in the games I played.

In games when I simmed, Ross Johnston had two 2 goal games. Sustr also had a 2 goal game, and also scored the game winner with four seconds remaining of regulation in the game 2 of the Stanley Cup finals.

And in one of the finals I played, Marian Studenic scored two goals within two minutes. He was controlled by a bot and I had nothing to do with either goal.


Playoff stats:

Forwards:

NameGPGAP+/-PIM
Gustav Nyquist (83)2213922+134
Boone Jenner (84)2261521+836
Oliver Bjorkstrand (83)2271320+102
Zach Sanford (79)226814+515
Sean Kuraly (80)227613+919
Jack Roslovic (82)226612+54
Jakub Voracek (84)195510-44
Cole Sillinger (79)224610-26
Marian Studenic (77)22459+76
Ross Johnston (77)21459+612
Alexandre Texier (81)22358+12
Eric Robinson (80)18257+12
Brendan Gaunce (77)10202-16
Patrik Laine (87) +2202-20
Yegor Chinakhov (78)2000-10

Defensemen:

NameGPGAP+/-PIM
Zach Werenski (88)226713+24
Vladislav Gavrikov (84)2221012+1516
Adam Boqvist (82)1911112+124
Jake Bean (83)22088+60
Mark Pysyk (79)22336+14
Andrej Sustr (78)18303+114
Andrew Peeke (81) +300002
Gabriel Carlsson (78)100000

Goaltenders:

NameGPWSOSV%GAA
Elvis Merzlikins (85)1613191.2%2.13
Joonas Korpisalo (79)62089.8%2.94
Daniil Tarasov (78)20091.8%2.42

I was supposed to do a rebuild, but somehow this team won it all in the first season.

Conclusion: Forget all star teams. Build around guys who perform, no matter the overall.
 
Last edited:

Vancouver Canucks

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
14,591
2,587
Congratulations!

EA has a history of having Columbus, Carolina, Calgary sim well sometimes. I've been playing NHL since 2004.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sufferer

Rich Nixon

No Prior Knowledge of "Flyers"
Jul 11, 2006
14,992
19,029
Key Biscayne
Congrats @Elvs !

It's been said around here before that sometimes you need a mid 80's team to win the cup. It's as if EA purposefully goes after you if you have a 90+ rated team

I tanked a couple years with an expansion team, drafted two Franchise players (including Bedard), signed MacKinnon in free agency, stacked my defense with 85+ and had some decent goaltending...can't make the playoffs with that team simming.
 

Panthaz89

Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
Dec 24, 2016
13,324
5,822
Buffalo,NY
I tanked a couple years with an expansion team, drafted two Franchise players (including Bedard), signed MacKinnon in free agency, stacked my defense with 85+ and had some decent goaltending...can't make the playoffs with that team simming.
This is why EHM is much better for simming if you build a stacked team chances are you will be deep in the playoffs at least and if you build a monster team you might lose in the SCF every now and then.
 

ColbyChaos

Marty Snoozeman's Father
Sep 27, 2017
6,175
6,418
Will County
All your post told me is that way still sucks at simulating. Nothing like having a team of 90s play .500 while a team of 70s makes the conference finals. Simming has been wack ever since the new gen
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad