Brunner isn't in the same league as Hudler. Brunner is truly one dimensional, Hudler has 2 weaknesses(neutral zone speed/defense, and getting picked on in the defensive zone) and pluses across the board otherwise.
I made it obvious over the half decade it was happening, and still feel the same way... a Red Wings team that embraced Hudler as a piece of the puzzle would be much more fun to support, and arguably would be much more successful.
Hudler has one of the most unique skill sets in the NHL, and is a world class playmaker with an offensive IQ akin to Igor Larionov. To me that trumps the fact that he didn't fit into the current coaches system.
The Red Wings missed their chance at developing Hudler(and to a lesser but significant extent, Filpulla) as a bridge between Datsyuk and Zetterberg, and the new crop of prospects(nyquist,tatar), and ended up losing out on Hudler, right as he was headed into his prime, was comfortable taking on a leadership role, and supplied a seasons worth of evidence that his game was progressing in areas that were noted as a reason for his insufficient playing time in Detroit. In the salary cap era, that's not an opportunity an organization can afford to miss.
Calgary is a mess, but I've enjoyed watching Hudler play for Hartley. I'm skeptical that Hudler can keep his pace through the middle part of the season, but I think it's been obvious watching him since leaving, that the Red Wings created an unnecessary hole in their lineup and that Hudler's weaknesses are overblown.
Hockey is a game that rewards creativity, intangibles and rhythm. Hudler's time in Detroit highlighted the coaching staff's inabiltiy to embrace these factors of a hockey game/season.