Nah, you can't blatantly move the goalposts like that. Along with needing all those forwards to score that much, you said we need more than a .906 sv %, with absolutely all of these conditions having to be met in order to compete for a playoff spot :
Don't try and tell me that you meant .833. Maybe you lost track of how many different things you mentioned as part of the minimum, that's fine, it's complicated. Just enough with sliding around the goalposts.
If you have all of your individual benchmarks met, you're probably looking at 270+ goals. It's maybe not a juggernaut but it's a top ten offense, i.e. far more than the minimum needed to compete for a playoff spot.
Using the same chart from earlier in the thread, but upping the goals to 270, a .906 sv% gives us a goal differential that would have led the division last year (+32 was tops).
Save Percentage | Goals Against | Goal Differential |
0.92 | 200 | 70 |
0.915 | 212.5 | 57.5 |
0.91 | 225 | 45 |
0.905 | 237.5 | 32.5 |
0.9 | 250 | 20 |
0.895 | 262.5 | 7.5 |
0.89 | 275 | -5 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Granted this has shots against built into it (assumes 2500 shots against) and you might dispute my assumptions about that, and given your penchant for moving goalposts I suspect you might try it. I'll warn you in advance that we would need league worst shots against to have an even goal differential in this scenario.