how good was peak Martin Havlat?

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
28,736
16,122
i’ll say this: if i’m marty havlat i have a marian hossa voodoo doll.

i get that it’s pro sports and you have to be better than the other guy if you want to play, but just bad luck to be a hotshot young player and be buried behind two borderline HHOFers at the same position, and then later when you are a vet helping to lead an emerging young juggernaut there’s hossa again reaching free agency in the same year as you. you can’t fault chicago for upgrading, of course, but i think havlat’s career looks quite different if he doesn’t cross paths with hossa twice.

ftr, havlat was very good in the playoffs in chicago until he got hurt in the west finals on a kronwall hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hippasus

Troubadour

Registered User
Feb 23, 2018
1,157
842
Maybe during the regular season, when play tightened up in the playoffs he ended with 0 points in 4 games.

Play usually tightens up a couple of games prior to the playoffs. Again, thank you for reminding us of that remarkable point streak, and thank you for reminding us that the following twenty-year-old Havlat's point drought could have had something to do with that ugly hit.

You excel at accomplishing the perfect opposite of what you aim for :thumbu:
 

streitz

Registered User
Jul 22, 2018
1,258
319
Play usually tightens up a couple of games prior to the playoffs. Again, thank you for reminding us of that remarkable point streak, and thank you for reminding us that the following twenty-year-old Havlat's point drought could have had something to do with that ugly hit.

You excel at accomplishing the perfect opposite of what you aim for :thumbu:
I seriously don't get what your point is.

He had 0 points in the playoffs in question, he usually sucked in the playoffs apparently with the exception of 2009 which I didn't watch so I won't take anything away from him there(he has good stats in 2006 aswell).
 

TheMoreYouKnow

Registered User
May 3, 2007
16,405
3,448
38° N 77° W
I think he was a talented offensive player and legit 1st liner in terms of ability, but I'd say even at his absolute peak he was a 2nd tier scorer in the league, top 15-20 scorer maybe. If injuries hadn't broken him down repeatedly he'd probably have had a career to be considered one of those Hall of Good scoring wingers a la Milan Hejduk or Marian Gaborik.
 

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,293
12,973
Toronto, Ontario
Wasn't a fan honestly, just unremarkable in every sense aside from some stickwork followed by turtling.

Considering he was one of the fastest skaters in the NHL, this is a very odd thing to say about him.

If you think his skating was "unremarkable" you clearly didn't pay close attention to him at all.
 

Troubadour

Registered User
Feb 23, 2018
1,157
842
i’ll say this: if i’m marty havlat i have a marian hossa voodoo doll.

i get that it’s pro sports and you have to be better than the other guy if you want to play, but just bad luck to be a hotshot young player and be buried behind two borderline HHOFers at the same position, and then later when you are a vet helping to lead an emerging young juggernaut there’s hossa again reaching free agency in the same year as you. you can’t fault chicago for upgrading, of course, but i think havlat’s career looks quite different if he doesn’t cross paths with hossa twice.

ftr, havlat was very good in the playoffs in chicago until he got hurt in the west finals on a kronwall hit.

Interesting take.

Here's another:

For the Blackhawks, Havlat peaked in 08/09, scoring 77 points in 81 games. 29 goals, 48 assists.

Hossa with Chicago peaked at... 77 points in 81 games. 29 goals, 48 assists.
 

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
28,736
16,122
not specific to this thread, but here's a wacky hypothesis. people who drop in on threads all over this and other forums on hfboards (and everywhere else on the internet, it seems) to bluster opinions as facts, repeatedly, without making arguments or showing their reasoning or giving evidence, and reasserting the same debatable point over and over again without actually debating, instead of thinking about these people as addicted to arguing on the internet, or lacking critical reasoning skills, or a waste of everyone's time, i tend to think of these people as employees of hfboards, tasked with driving up traffic. because nothing solicits multiple responses, and therefore drives up banner ad revenue, like repeated inflammatory statements from posters who seem immune to considering counterarguments.

anywho,

Interesting take.

Here's another:

For the Blackhawks, Havlat peaked in 08/09, scoring 77 points in 81 games. 29 goals, 48 assists.

Hossa with Chicago peaked at... 77 points in 81 games. 29 goals, 48 assists.

chicago havlat was seriously underrated, but come on. marian hossa was also a top 3 defensive winger in the league.
 

Langdon Alger

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
24,777
12,913
Nothing special, average scorer who wasn't great in the playoffs. Chippy, I remember him getting into some slashing or spearing incident with a flyers player in 2004 but don't remember who.


Wasn't a fan honestly, just unremarkable in every sense aside from some stickwork followed by turtling.

This is a terrible take.
 

Langdon Alger

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
24,777
12,913
Then they got rid of him since they got an actual hockey player in Hossa.

Havlat had 161 points in 172 regular season games in Chicago, along with 15 points in 16 playoff games. If you don’t like him, fine, but stop acting like he was a horrible player. He wasn’t. He was a very skilled player who had major injury issues.
 

Langdon Alger

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
24,777
12,913
So in other words he wasnt't good in the playoffs outside of one run in 05-06.

He was good in 2003 with 11 points in 18 games and in 2009 with 15 points in 16 games. He had some bad playoffs like in 2004 where had just 3 assists in 7 games, but he was alright overall with 52 points in 75 playoff games. Left you wanting more though.
 

streitz

Registered User
Jul 22, 2018
1,258
319
Havlat had 161 points in 172 regular season games in Chicago, along with 15 points in 16 playoff games. If you don’t like him, fine, but stop acting like he was a horrible player. He wasn’t. He was a very skilled player who had major injury issues.

Not a fan of players known for kicking with skates or slashing people in the face.
 

Langdon Alger

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
24,777
12,913
Not a fan of players known for kicking with skates or slashing people in the face.

Fair enough, but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t a skilled player. I got sick of his antics at times too. There’s no excuse for what he did to Recchi or when he kicked two guys I believe it was, but to say he was unremarkable in every sense just shows you don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m guessing he never played for your favourite team or for a team you’ve watched much. He had a lot of skill.
 

billybudd

Registered User
Feb 1, 2012
22,049
2,249
I resent the "soft" generalization for any player, and especially for European players, but it applies to Havlat. Without looking into it deeply, I remember his career as a more injured, slightly lesser version of Thomas Vanek.

:huh:
 

Johnny Engine

Moderator
Jul 29, 2009
4,979
2,360
Then they got rid of him since they got an actual hockey player in Hossa.
I always thought this series of moves was interesting, because it represented a completely closed loop where Markus Naslund's NHL retirement allowed Henrik Zetterberg to get a proper first-liner's contract.

Naslund left the Rangers for Sweden
The Rangers signed Marian Gaborik away from the Wild
The Wild signed Marty Havlat away from the Hawks
The Hawks signed Marian Hossa aways from the Wings
The Wings gave Henrik Zetterberg a big raise.

This is probably what the NHL intended when they instituted the cap - everyone gets a star if they want one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hippasus

streitz

Registered User
Jul 22, 2018
1,258
319
Fair enough, but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t a skilled player. I got sick of his antics at times too. There’s no excuse for what he did to Recchi or when he kicked two guys I believe it was, but to say he was unremarkable in every sense just shows you don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m guessing he never played for your favourite team or for a team you’ve watched much. He had a lot of skill.


I never said he wasn't skilled I said he wasn't that noteworthy, and no offense to him aside from leading a couple bad teams in scoring and being injured a lot he never did much.
 

streitz

Registered User
Jul 22, 2018
1,258
319
I always thought this series of moves was interesting, because it represented a completely closed loop where Markus Naslund's NHL retirement allowed Henrik Zetterberg to get a proper first-liner's contract.

Naslund left the Rangers for Sweden
The Rangers signed Marian Gaborik away from the Wild
The Wild signed Marty Havlat away from the Hawks
The Hawks signed Marian Hossa aways from the Wings
The Wings gave Henrik Zetterberg a big raise.

This is probably what the NHL intended when they instituted the cap - everyone gets a star if they want one.


Parity in a nutshell, another reason I'm not a fan of the new NHL.
 

Langdon Alger

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
24,777
12,913
I never said he wasn't skilled I said he wasn't that noteworthy, and no offense to him aside from leading a couple bad teams in scoring and being injured a lot he never did much.

Well, injuries were a big part of that. He missed a lot of time from 2005-2008 where he was 24-27. Had he been healthy for those three years, he likely puts up pretty big numbers. He also played behind Alfie and Hossa for most of his time in Ottawa, so he had guys like Fisher and Smolinski as his centres. It would have been nice to see him with a really good centreman. Not sure who he played with after he left Ottawa.

I mean, I’m likely not going to change your mind since you seem to think he’s average, and obviously you hated how he played, but he’s still better than you’re giving him credit for.
 

ShelbyZ

Registered User
Apr 8, 2015
3,812
2,575
I don't remember too much of Havlat other than getting crunched by Kronwall in the playoffs with the Hawks and then thinking in the back of my head that he moved from team to team much more than he actually did after looking at his stats.

He must've been very good or possibly elite at some point. I can't remember what year it was (probably somewhere between 2004 and 2009), but I clearly remember watching the first round of an NHL draft where Martin Havlat was essentially the benchmark that all the forward picks were measured against. At one point, one of the commentators said something to the effect of "Wow, lots of Martin Havlats in this draft."
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad