Im not ignoring that at all it’s just not relevant. BT while young and good is nowhere near pasta and will probably never have a ceiling like him let alone a chance on a prospect that is never a guaranteed while also moving another young lw in JD is just plain crazy.I think you're ignoring the inclusion of Brady Tkachuk here. He himself was a #4 pick, who's still holds that kind of value.
Im not ignoring that at all it’s just not relevant. BT while young and good is nowhere near pasta and will probably never have a ceiling like him let alone a chance on a prospect that is never a guaranteed while also moving another young lw in JD is just plain crazy.
I’m sitting here and telling you it’s not worth more than DP and JD how is that hard to understand? The bruins couldGreat....but the trade is for BT and the #3 overall. That's a huge package. Boston fans keep valuing each asset individually and comparing it to Pastrnak. While agreed that either asset isn't worth Pastrnak, the combination of both BT and the #3 overall is worth more than BT, and Debrusk is of a lower asset class that does not close that gap.
That's not what it means. That's what people who make bad offers say that it means.
What it actually means is both teams hate it without any value judgment attached.
I have huge questions for those who say Boston wins by trading an established superstar who is making probably 40% less than his play would imply who is 24.
Are you claiming that the bruins get all the value in this trade? Because that is nuts the 3rd overall and BT is not worth Pasta and Debrusk.What do you mean no value judgement? Its precisely because both sides feel they are getting hosed (i.e. no value). Come on man you can't be serious, they can't both be right.
The other side gets all the vulue to them which is rediculous in this case.
I mentioned that in my original post about Pastrnak and the 3rd overall, but everyone just assumed I was saying Pasta was not worth the 3rd pick.More....like a recent 4th overall pick who's transitioned well to the NHL in Brady Tkachuk? The trade isn't just for the 3rd overall. It also includes Tkachuk, who himself is a huge asset.
You don't really have any idea what you're talking about then.I disagree.
3OA is worth more because of3 yrs ELC so the ROZi would be greater because it’s a $1M vs $6Zm salary.
What do you mean no value judgement? Its precisely because both sides feel they are getting hosed (i.e. no value). Come on man you can't be serious, they can't both be right.
The other side gets all the vulue to them which is rediculous in this case.
You don't really have any idea what you're talking about then.
There's a good chance that whoever is picked at #3 doesn't even play in the NHL next season... Let alone come anywhere close to the ~50G/100pts Pastrnak will put up.
yes, you totally start a retool by trading a 23yr old Rocket winner who has 4 full seasons age 20-23 of:
34-36-70 in 75 (0.93 ppg)
35-45-80 in 82 (0.98 ppg)
38-43-81 in 66 (1.23 ppg)
48-47-95 in 70 (1.36 ppg)
Christ, that 1st transaction was dumb enough to negate any word you typed after it
Never heard of ELC bonuses, then?If he doesn’t next year, he will the following year.
His cap hit is $6.67M. Say he scores 90 pts. How many pts does a player need to ear ehrn making $1M to be an equivalent ROI? 14 pts is the same $/pt value when comparing the salaries.
You don't really have any idea what you're talking about then.
There's a good chance that whoever is picked at #3 doesn't even play in the NHL next season... Let alone come anywhere close to the ~50G/100pts Pastrnak will put up.
yes, you totally start a retool by trading a 23yr old Rocket winner who has 4 full seasons age 20-23 of:
34-36-70 in 75 (0.93 ppg)
35-45-80 in 82 (0.98 ppg)
38-43-81 in 66 (1.23 ppg)
48-47-95 in 70 (1.36 ppg)
Christ, that 1st transaction was dumb enough to negate any word you typed after it
It doesn’t matter who they sign. Pasta isn’t going anywhere period. And your taking abo so called point production going down after he loses 37 and 67 but who’s to say he can’t do it without them? Pasta is elite at play making and scoring and the bruins down grab by moving pasta and JD for a pick that is all chance and BTWhy do you think I have them signing Hall? Come on
man how about you read what I proposed instead
of throwing insults around?
Yeah sorry DeBrusk+Pastrnak doesn't return Tkachuk+#3 pick Pastrnak is good but come on that's insane.
I read what you proposed it just wasn't any good.That's why I have them signing Hall. To help mitigate
Pastrnak's void, come on man, read what I proposed.
Boston isn't beating TB next year w/o the addition
of Hall AND AP. The proposals by Bruin fans is strictly
re-arranging deck chairs on The Titanic. Hall alone isn't
closing the gap. AP alone IMO will close it more than just Hall.
Wait... what? I loathe Boston and even I can admit this would be a fleecing for Ottawa. Pastrnak's already a top 5 winger in the league and far more valuable than any of the other pieces
Yeah sorry DeBrusk+Pastrnak doesn't return Tkachuk+#3 pick Pastrnak is good but come on that's insane.
Oh were playing that game, you forgot the most likely "what if" of all. What if Pastrnak decides to walk in 3 years because he wants to win a cup and Ottawa is still rebuilding?No on agrees with you on this. What if Byfield doesn't end up being good? What if Tkachuk never breaks out and is just a good 2nd line player?
Imagine trading a young 100pt player on one of the best contracts in the world for a couple 40-50pt players
Then you trade him for a metric shit ton.Oh were playing that game, you forgot the most likely "what if" of all. What if Pastrnak decides to walk in 3 years because he wants to win a cup and Ottawa is still rebuilding?