Stats gonna get even nicer under Hitch.
That one fan is sure happy he can use his Schultz/Maroon jersey again.Seeing a goalie wear 19 has taken some getting used to but I like it now.
Small sample size but looks okay so far. As others have said, will reserve judgement until the season is over, or later next year
Oiler fans might want to cool it on pumping up Koskinen’s tires. He and Chiasson are UFAs this summer and they may look to strike it rich as this could be their last chances to earn big pay days in their careers. Bobrovsky looks meh this season and there could be lots of teams looking for new starters. In economics, lots of demand and not a lot of supply means $$$.
Koskinen is gonna get paid this summer. The sheer number of struggling goaltenders this season coupled with a finite number of UFA goaltenders on the market means Koskinen is going to have many suitors to choose from driving that price up. Not sure the Oilers can afford to pay both him and Chiasson’s raises.
Michael Hutchinson had an amazing stretch out of nowhere as well.
He (Hutchinson) is not an NHL level goalie.
We will see how long this lasts.
That's a very fair point. Even though he's turning it around lately, Hellebuyck has also looked quite bad at times this year -- many games far worse than even Koskinen's very worst game (and he really hasn't had a stinker, actually, while Helle has had more than a few). Goalies are like some strange voodoo magic. You just never know how any goalie will rise or fall. Who saw Rittich being as good as he's been in Calgary? Will that continue? Is Halak going to keep up this pace, being 2nd in the league in SV%? There's a lot of examples if you look around.
When you have a hot goalie, you take it and enjoy it while it lasts. Koskto has been great. Any negativity coming from sour fans who hate the Oilers is just noise.
Michael Hutchinson had an amazing stretch out of nowhere as well.
He (Hutchinson) is not an NHL level goalie.
We will see how long this lasts.
Koskinen has been elite for years in Europe.
The question is can he be elite at the NHL level but he atleast has been elite through his career for years.
Personally, I don't care about being elite in Europe.
Alexandre Giroux tore the AHL apart and did jack in the NHL.
Well then your team could be missing of some elite talent.
Panarin& Dadonov were okay in Europe and are 1st line players in the NHL.
This doesn't mean Koskinen can be a Vezina winner in the NHL but would be stupid to just ignore Europe.
KHL& AHL are 2 very different leagues.
We are really saying the same thing, you just seem more willing to put stock into success in other leagues.
That's fine.
That's fine.Being elite in KHL for years/some time yes, other leagues no.
The difference between Toronto's and Edmonton's situations are that Toronto has far more depth and less bad contracts. The Oilers are a cap team with 2 stars and little behind them.Chaisson will get 2.5M. Koskinen will get 3.5-4M if he keeps his play up. That's 6.5M, plus with contracts from Talbot gone (At this point, you keep either Koskinen or Talbot) and 11M in cap space, that's 15+M in Cap, and that's NOT including the 3.5M extra cap from going from 79.5 to 83M as projected for next year. The leafs are in a lot worse cap trouble than the Oilers.
Obviously you do. Don't like it, nobody is forcing you to take the time to open the thread and post a reply.Hey look....another post about the Oilers on the main board. Nobody cares. Take it to the Oilers forum.
Hey look....another post about the Oilers on the main board. Nobody cares. Take it to the Oilers forum.
Can you refrain from turning this into a Toronto pissing contest? Stay on topic.The difference between Toronto's and Edmonton's situations are that Toronto has far more depth and less bad contracts. The Oilers are a cap team with 2 stars and little behind them.
Toronto is where Edmonton wants to be depth-wise, but disastrous asset management has left Edmonton with $15m to use to try and plug about 8 holes in the lineup. In order to be a contender, Edmonton needs a top 4 puck moving defenceman and 3 top 6 forwards.
Toronto has everyone minus a defenceman. We just have to worry about re-signing everyone. This is a good problem to have for Toronto. Too many good players, while Edmonton has too many poor contracts.
The difference between Toronto's and Edmonton's situations are that Toronto has far more depth and less bad contracts. The Oilers are a cap team with 2 stars and little behind them.
Toronto is where Edmonton wants to be depth-wise, but disastrous asset management has left Edmonton with $15m to use to try and plug about 8 holes in the lineup. In order to be a contender, Edmonton needs a top 4 puck moving defenceman and 3 top 6 forwards.
Toronto has everyone minus a defenceman. We just have to worry about re-signing everyone. This is a good problem to have for Toronto. Too many good players, while Edmonton has too many poor contracts.