Joey Hoser
Registered User
So if Rielly or Bolland got injured or someone even more important like Kessel or Phaneuf, do we continue saying, once we are healthy, everything will be fine?
Considering we're 10-4 with injuries, makes sense.
So if Rielly or Bolland got injured or someone even more important like Kessel or Phaneuf, do we continue saying, once we are healthy, everything will be fine?
Of course I'm thrilled with the wins we're racking up but we have some serious issues with this team. We're extremely opportunistic, which is awesome but we can't keep playing the way we're playing. As the season continues, teams are going to tighten up a lot more and we won't have as many mistakes to capitalize on.
Will Kulemin and Fraser coming back change that? Maybe a little.
What do the Leafs need to make us feel confident the whole game?
Better d-zone system?
Stud defensive defenseman on the top pair which pushes everyone else down? (If so, who and how do we get them?)
Reimer: .949
Bernier: .933
Barring an historic season, those two numbers WILL regress. This team will have to limit shots against to prevent giving up more goals, that's fact. Hopefully the high shot totals are more a product of playing with a lead so often than defensive deficiencies. If that's the case, the team will be able to handle the inevitable regression. We'll just have to wait and find out.
Of course I'm thrilled with the wins we're racking up but we have some serious issues with this team. We're extremely opportunistic, which is awesome but we can't keep playing the way we're playing. As the season continues, teams are going to tighten up a lot more and we won't have as many mistakes to capitalize on.
Will Kulemin and Fraser coming back change that? Maybe a little.
What do the Leafs need to make us feel confident the whole game?
Better d-zone system?
Stud defensive defenseman on the top pair which pushes everyone else down? (If so, who and how do we get them?)
The shots were 43-22 for Calgary but the scoring chances were only 19-13.
FWIW, Carlyle was on FAN 590 today and said that by their own count (they keep an in-house record of scoring chance differential), the differential was 18-12.
He said that ideally they don't want to allow any more than 10 in a game, and they'll be looking to improve in that area.
He also noted, as you did, that turnovers are a big problem and they'll be working on minimizing those.
There is a coaching problem on this team. 10-4 is a nice start but lets face it, if not for our goaltending, It would be closer to .500.
Our breakouts are terrible, it's far too easy to pressure our D and get them to cough the puck, it is far too easy to get quality shots against our goaltenders, it is far too easy to cycle against them.
We HAVE to pay better attention in our own zone. Coaching is a problem.
Simple as that.
Love the clutch goalscoring and dependable goaltending though..
I'm glad the coach isn't delusional about the teams play.
We have played well at times and most games but there have been a lot of breakdowns. If Carlyle believes it's only a matter of time before it really hurts us in the standings, I really hope the players smarten up themselves.
Fans say that teams tighten up more as the season goes a long. Let's hope we can be one of those teams.
I think the House of Cards analogy was bang on and sometimes, as hard as it is when your team is winning, a lot of hockey fans know their stuff! Of course this doesn't mean that the season is doomed, but it may force some of the players who are making the same mistakes, same plays over and over, to listen to the coaching staff more. A lot of times winning masks bad habits and it will be a dogfight to the end in the East.