seventieslord
Student Of The Game
- Eligibility and Ranking Criteria
- Any person who spent the majority of his career playing as a winger or who has the majority of his accomplishments as a winger is eligible
- It is highly recommended that you use these guidelines to determine whether a player qualifies as a "winger" for the purposes of this project (link)
- A player who qualifies as a winger should be ranked based on his overall accomplishments as a forward or hockey player.
- Players should be judged only on their accomplishments as hockey players
- Players currently active are eligible, but should be ranked based only on what they have already done
- Preliminary Discussion Thread
- Anyone may participate in this thread, even if he does not plan on taking part in the voting phase
- Any winger may be discussed
- Posters are encouraged to share information about players in this thread and to take information shared into account when constructing their own lists
- Brief comparisons between players are permitted, but detailed cases and debates should be saved for Round 2 of Voting
- Please do NOT rank players outright in the preliminary thread
- Voting
- Round 1
- All participants submit a list of 80 wingers ranked in order
- All eras MUST be considered, and consideration should be given to both NHL and non-NHL players
- To make it easier to aggregate the submitted lists, please list players using their most commonly used name; e.g. Dickie Moore, not Richard Moore; Gordie Howe, not Gordon Howe
- Lists may be submitted via email to [email protected] or via PM to seventieslord. Excel format is preferred, but a top to bottom list of 80 is fine too
- We will be accepting lists until August 8 Please PM seventieslord if you can't make this timeframe and would like to participate
- Players will be assigned a point value on the list based on ranking
- Players will be awarded 80 points for a 1st place vote down to 1 point for a 80th place vote
- An aggregate list of the top wingers will be compiled ranking them in order of the most total points
- Participants MUST submit a list in Round 1 to be eligible for Round 2
- Round 2
- The top 8-10 ranked players from the aggregate list will be posted in a thread
- Players will be listed in alphabetical order to avoid creating bias
- Player merits and rankings will be open for discussion and debate for a period of five (5) days. Administrators may extend the discussion period if it remains active
- Final voting will occur for two (2) days, via PM
- For the first 5 rounds, participants will vote for their top 8 players from the available candidates. 1st place votes will be worth 8 points, 2nd place votes worth 7 points, etc. The top 4 vote getters will be added to the final list.
- For rounds 6-13, participants will vote for their top 10 players from the available candidates. 1st place votes will be worth 10 points, 2nd place votes worth 9 points, etc. The top 5 vote getters will be added to the final list
- If there are major breaks in the Round 2 voting totals, we will add more or less than the targeted 4 or 5 players in certain rounds
- The number of players available for discussion at once will increase from 8 as we move down the list, based on natural breaks in the aggregate list put together in Round 1
- Tiebreak procedure: If two players are tied in voting points after a round, the higher ranking will go to the player who was ahead on a greater number of ballots. If they are still tied, it will remain a tie on the final list.
- Round 1
- Quality Assurance
- Lists will be subject to an evaluation process
- The submitter of a questionable list will be given an opportunity to defend or justify any selection under question or to correct errors and resubmit
- The complete voting record of every participant will be released at the end of the project
- Participants Code of Conduct
- Participants must recognize that this is a collaborative project and that we all share the same goals, no matter how much we disagree on individual ranking
- Participants should treat each other with respect and must not openly question the motivations of other participants
- Repeatedly violating these rules may result in ban from this project and possibly similar future projects on the History of Hockey board
Last edited by a moderator: