Hockey's Future Top 50 Prospects: 11-25

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Holly Gunning, Nov 14, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Holly Gunning

    Holly Gunning Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    out and about
    Home Page:
  2. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    Can't see Mark Stuart in the top 10.

    Ovechkin
    Malkin
    Fleury
    Phaneuf
    Suter
    Horton
    Lehtonen
    Zherdev
    Vanek
    Michalek

    ?

    Which would leave him out of the top 50.
     
  3. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still am amazed Henrik Lundqvist doesnt get any respect. Hes better than Montoya.
     
  4. Aaron Vickers

    Aaron Vickers FC Hockey

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Managing Editor, FC Hockey
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Home Page:
    He's also got a few years on Montoya, does he not?
     
  5. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What does age have to do with anything? Younger doesnt equal better.
     
  6. Aaron Vickers

    Aaron Vickers FC Hockey

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Managing Editor, FC Hockey
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Home Page:
    When talking about POTENTIAL, I don't see the relevence in one player currently being better then another. We're talking about upside, not who is currently a better goaltender. An older goaltender obviously has had a longer time to develop his skills.
     
  7. TML

    TML Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton
    I agree. There must be an error.
     
  8. Prucha73

    Prucha73 Guest

    How does Jeff Drouin-Deslauriers make the top 50 while Lundqvist does not? Makes no sense.
     
  9. jcorb58

    jcorb58 Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,532
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    96
    My Top 25 would of been
    1-Ovechkin
    2-Lehtonen
    3-Zherdev
    4-Malkin
    5-Phaneuf
    6-Fleury
    7-Vanek
    8-Horton
    9-Carter
    10-Suter
    11-Barker
    12-Coburn
    13-Semin
    14-Parise
    15-Micheluk
    16-Tiovenan
    17-Brown
    18-Stewart
    19-Kostitsyn
    20-Montoya
    21-Stuart
    22-Getzlaf
    23-Tjutin
    24-O'Sullivan
    25-Babchuk
     
  10. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You honestly think the other goalies on the list will be leading their Country to the WC at 22? Not only that but be stoning the top NHL'ers at that age? You think the other goalies listed have a higher ceiling?
     
  11. TML

    TML Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton
    I don't want to sound harsh.. I appreciate these lists. But... aren't you contradicting yourself when you put a 23 year old Ouellet ahead of Montoya?
     
  12. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    No error, when you see Whitney and Grebeshkov in the later stages of the list, Mark Stuart shouldn't be in the top 25.
     
  13. TML

    TML Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton
    I mean there is an error by not including Mark Stuart in the top 50 prospects list. He is a solid defensive prospect, much like Colaiacovo. I know Stuart isn't a top 10 prospect. IMO, Stuart should've been between 15-35.

    I agree with your top 10, Leafaholix.
     
  14. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    I can't say I agree, Stuart is a solid prospect. But his upside doesn't match up with the likes of Grebeshkov, Whitney, Colaiacovo, etc...
     
  15. Amen evil king

    Amen evil king Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,490
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    101
    No Kesler eh? A whole lot of arguing over nothing. :D
     
  16. TML

    TML Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton
    Stuart was #15 last year. You don't think he is a top 50 prospect, this year?
     
  17. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    Don't know what they based their rankings on, but Grebeshkov was #16 and he fell to #44 after a fine season in the AHL and a stint with the Kings.
     
  18. Onion Boy

    Onion Boy Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,771
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Unemployed
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Maybe this is homerish, but no Lundqvist in the top 50 has to be the most glaring omission. Personally I think he's underrated by most Ranger fans too, including myself. While certainly not a top 10, and possibly not a top 20, to be left out of the top 50 is a bit excessive. It's the opinion of many people that he may just be the most underrated prospect in the entire NHL because he's never had the benefit of hype.

    I know the big question mark is his ability to make the transition to NA ice, but age shouldn't really be a factor. I just come he comes over a proves a great deal of people wrong.
     
  19. Aaron Vickers

    Aaron Vickers FC Hockey

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Managing Editor, FC Hockey
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Home Page:
    I'm not contradicting myself at all. In fact, I wasn't even a part of the Top 50 Group.

    It's entirely possible though, that the group felt the upside of Ouellet is greater thent hat of Montoya.
     
  20. Kirk- NEHJ

    Kirk- NEHJ Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    12,745
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    U.S. Army
    Location:
    CAV Country!
    Home Page:
    Exactly.

    And if you use the argument that Al Montoya's leading his team to a WJC championship is critical to him being ranked inside the top-20, then there is no excuse for Stuart not to be in the top-50. He's been even better so far this year than he was last year. And if the rankings are based on what happened last year, then how do you justify leaving off the captain of Team USA?

    If Stuart is top-10, then I'd say that's tool high. Hannu Toivonen is Boston's top prospect, and Stuart is a close No. 2 in my opinion (and that of others), but to have Toivonen at 23 and Stuart inside the top-10 doesn't jive. Nor does having Toivonen at 23 and Stuart not even inside the top-50.

    But, these lists are subjective. I give the staff credit for putting them together, even though I disagree with some of them. At the same time, it just appears that some players are put on the list based on where they are drafted.
     
  21. TML

    TML Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton
    OK. Fair enough. :)
     
  22. Aaron Vickers

    Aaron Vickers FC Hockey

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Managing Editor, FC Hockey
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Home Page:
    What I think is irrelevent to the list. I wasn't a part of the Top 50 Group.
     
  23. Kubera55

    Kubera55 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think I have to second this one. . . I'm actually fine with where Montoya got slotted, and that Lundqvist didn't make the list. But Ouellet has hardly dominated the AHL in his lengthy stay there. Other than being a 1st round pick, I really wonder what guys like him (and Ahonen) have that makes them stick on these lists despite years of not really making much noise.

    I mean, they are still good prospects, put top 50? Top 25? Ehhhh not so much. At least I don't think so . . .
     
  24. Winston Wolf

    Winston Wolf Registered User

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    10,945
    Likes Received:
    2,975
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    Oahu, HI
    I just have a problem with Ouellet being number 49 last year, then moving up to number 19 this year. He should be somewhere on the list though.
     
  25. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    Well, haven't you caught on... playing in the NHL makes you elite!

    :shakehead
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"