Still laughing at the fact that Lundqvist didn´t make the list... HF has missed out on many players before but this must be the biggest omission ever.
The idea in itself to make a list like the HF does which is basically based on where the prospects are picked the last 2-3 years is pretty useless. A top 50 list which where based on potential which included all players who fill the prospects creteria would be a much more interesting read IMO. After all what matters are how good hockey players these prospects becomes when they turn pro, not how much hype they got before the age of 18...
The idea in itself to make a list like the HF does which is basically based on where the prospects are picked the last 2-3 years is pretty useless. A top 50 list which where based on potential which included all players who fill the prospects creteria would be a much more interesting read IMO. After all what matters are how good hockey players these prospects becomes when they turn pro, not how much hype they got before the age of 18...