Hockey's Future Top 50 prospects: 1-10

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Holly Gunning, Nov 16, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. Holly Gunning

    Holly Gunning Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    out and about
    Home Page:
  2. sunb

    sunb Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Yale University
    Nothing really wrong with that. I'd rather have Phaneuf over Horton and Fleury but I can see it the other way as well.
     
  3. Vyse64

    Vyse64 N64

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    8,789
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    boxer by anime
    Location:
    Calgary AB
    Phaneuf over-rated has it it
    7th is fine
     
  4. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Constructive Criticism for the HF crew: If you guys want to be 'more professional' like I've heard I'd suggest not condradicting yourself so blatanly. On the Pens page Malkin is behind Fluery but on the top 50 Malkin is ahead of Fluery. I realize different people make both lists but its something to consider.
     
  5. loadie

    loadie Official Beer Taster Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,540
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Occupation:
    Retired Military
    Location:
    New Brunswick
    Looks like the top 10 is pretty much what most posters thought. Good job HF, you guys took a bit of flack with the list, by hey, you can't please everyone. :)
     
  6. Dave is a killer

    Dave is a killer Dave's a Mess

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    26,480
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Mount Juliet
    Home Page:
    Suter skipped his Sophomore, JR and SR years of college...not just his Senior ;)
     
  7. wedge

    wedge Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Occupation:
    teacher
    Location:
    victoriaville
    the top 10 is what I expected too

    the ranks 11-50 are worse...

    I still can't understand why Kronwall is not on the list.. lol
     
  8. craig1

    craig1 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Financial Manager/Scholar
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Home Page:
    Hmmmm.....Not bad. I have some minor disagreements with the order, but pretty good overall.
     
  9. No Quarter*

    No Quarter* Guest

    I'd put Fleury at #3 ahead of Malkin and Zherdev.
     
  10. Hunter Gathers

    Hunter Gathers ordinary corrupt human love Sponsor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    110,580
    Likes Received:
    8,067
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    corporate drone
    Location:
    parts unknown
    It's all pretty level where they are placed, IMO.

    I think Fleury should be top 4, but whatever.

    I'm not even a Fleruy fan, mind you.
     
  11. Mothra

    Mothra The Groovy Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    7,717
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    Home Page:
    I dont think you do
     
  12. Vagrant

    Vagrant The Czech Condor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,222
    Likes Received:
    2,243
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Home Page:
    One thing that I really don't get is how players like Bergeron and Staal aren't eligible for this list and players like Horton and Zherdev are. Horton would have played a full NHL season if not for injuries, and he still played a great deal of the season and played a pretty decent amount. Zherdev played a lot for CBJ this year as well. What was the GP cut off list for this list?

    Once again, disappointed not to see Cam Ward crack the list. The main oversight.
     
  13. SmokeyClause

    SmokeyClause Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    9,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    M&A Consultant
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Home Page:

    Yeah, I don't understand the 65 games (I think that is what it is) cutoff. Why not go with 80-82 to represent a full season. It doesn't make sense to punish a durable player and cater to one who gets injured. I think it should be closer to 100 myself. Are you telling me that a kid like Chistov isn't still a prospect?
     
  14. Vagrant

    Vagrant The Czech Condor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,222
    Likes Received:
    2,243
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Home Page:
    Answered my own question, it's 65 games. That's way too much if you ask me. Horton played 55 and he's not eligible for the Calder next season, I don't know why HF doesn't have the same standards if a player has solidified himself as a roster player instead of a prospect. Oh well.
     
  15. Vagrant

    Vagrant The Czech Condor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,222
    Likes Received:
    2,243
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Home Page:
    Come to think of it you're probably right. The only thing that made Horton still a prospect this year was a little lack of durability. Which doesn't make sense. It needs to be raised before lowered. My mistake.
     
  16. King'sPawn

    King'sPawn Enjoy the chaos

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2003
    Messages:
    11,738
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Thank you to the HF Committee who took the time to decide the top 50 prospects. Your time and work into this stuff doesn't get enough appreciation sometimes, so I just wanted to sound off on your hard work :)
     
  17. Enoch

    Enoch This is my boomstick

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    13,882
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Cookeville TN
    Have to agree with Caniac and Smokey here. 100 games or a full season should be the cutoff. Very surprised at Malkin over Fleury. Also surprised to see Michalek and Vanek still ahead of Suter.....although I certainly understand I'm playing with peanuts and opinions here. Solid top 10, props to HF regardless of my disagreeance with their placement of several players.
     
  18. Kevin Forbes

    Kevin Forbes Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,202
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    129
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    Home Page:
    The cut off was 65 games.

    Interesting point based on top 20 rankings compared to top 50 rankings.
    A similar situation between Malkin and Fleury occured with Anaheim prospects, #2 Bryzgalov being ranked higher then #1 Getzlaf. Personally, I agreed with it, due to the fact that Getzlaf as a skilled forward with size and strength was more valuable to Anaheim then Bryzgalov, while Anaheim already has Giguere. However in the long run, Bryzgalov has the potential (and looks to become) a better overall player.
    I can't say for sure if it's a similar situation to this in Pittsburgh case, mainly because I'm not as familiar with their organization, but it is something to think about. Also, comparing goalies to forwards is quite hard to do, so there's a lot of room for interpretation.
    And again, with a lot of rankings like this, the differences in scores is a fraction of a point. I didn't work on the Top 50, but I know with the Org Ranking, it was down to the tenths of a decimal to decide between some teams.
     
  19. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    :dunno: If your going to say this is HF top 50 prospects and put out another one says this is the Rangers top 20 prospects its from the site. Meaning its not "John Doe's top 20 Rangers prospects". If you put a label on it thats if HF's top prospects it should be the sites opinion . Meaning, HF things (ex) Malkin is better than Fluery. If you look around the site you can't find which one HF likes better. Its a little tough to explain. But I'm trying to say there should be consistancy within the site if you want to say this is HF's rankings and not John Does rankings.
     
  20. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The cutoff should be 25 games. Just like it is in the NHL.
     
  21. craig1

    craig1 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Financial Manager/Scholar
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Home Page:
    That's rookie status. Not prospect status.
     
  22. NYRangers

    NYRangers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is no prospect status number in the NHL is there? So if someone isnt a rookie they shouldnt be a prospect IMO.
     
  23. David A. Rainer

    David A. Rainer Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    7,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Pro. Gameshow Contestant
    Location:
    Huntington Beach
    Home Page:
    There was some talk to raise it to 82 games back when it was raised. Some just thought that was too high. Maybe the 65 is the result of a compromise between those who wanted to leave it at 40 and those who wanted it at 82.

    For Chistov to be included, it would have to be raised to like 140 games. That's just way too high. Hell, at that level, Frolov would almost still be a prospect but I don't think anyone would consider him a prospect anymore (great young player? yes, but not a prospect).

    And for the understatement of the year...

    The top 10 is anti-climatic.
     
  24. David A. Rainer

    David A. Rainer Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    7,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Pro. Gameshow Contestant
    Location:
    Huntington Beach
    Home Page:
    I see what you're saying, and that is a possibility. But I don't see the problem with being a prospect and not qualify as a rookie anymore. It happens in baseball all the time because their rookie requirement is relatively low and most of the prospect sites would still consider a non-rookie a prospect.
     
  25. #2

    #2 Registered User

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    this isnt about the top 10, but the top 50 in general, im not sure, maybe i just missed it but i didnt see Marek Svatos on the top 50 list??. He definetley is a good prospect, not top 10 material but i could see him definetley ahead of alot of prospects maybe around the 23-27 range. He had a good playoff campaign with the Avalanche and looks to be a promising upcoming forward.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"