Hockey's Future Organizational Rankings, Spring 2011 21-30

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by HF Article, May 13, 2011.

View Users: View Users
  1. HF Article

    HF Article Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    12,507
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The bottom third of NHL organizations as voted on by HF staff.

    More...
     
  2. North Man

    North Man Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    51
    I realize the Flames don't have the best prospects around, but you guys obviously have no idea about /dont even watch much of their prospects. Not even a mention of Reinhart? Nemisz better than Howse, Irving, and Brodie? :help:
    I'm starting to get sick how HF just crap on the Flames' prospect pool all the time.

    /Rant

    Nice list otherwise.
     
  3. SuperSaiyanBeastmode

    SuperSaiyanBeastmode Registered User

    Joined:
    May 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,982
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ontario
    philly should of been last, at least erixon has top 4 potential... philly has no one that even has a chance of doing anything significant at the nhl level... that versteeg trade was not smart thinking by holmgren.
     
  4. DJB

    DJB #MELNYKOUT

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Trophy Points:
    173
    I don't see a problem with a GM using picks to acquire a player if they beleive the have a legit shot at a Cup. Holmgren thought he had a shot.

    The 1st rounder should have been used on a goaltender rather then another forward though.
     
  5. Going5Hole

    Going5Hole Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am guessing the LA Kings as #1. When Jordan Weal and Linden Vey can't crack your top 10 prospects, you know your have some serious organizational depth.
     
  6. bjtkyo

    bjtkyo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    615
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    huh.. Would've thought Colorado would be much higher. Seems like they have a lot of young talent there, but maybe I'm being blinded by the ages on the roster.

    The rest of the teams in this range (21-30) seem about right to me. I think Calgary might have an edge over Philly tbh, but none of the bottom 3 have anything to be proud of.

    Kings, Oilers, Panthers, Isles, Leafs on top.
     
  7. HighLifeMan

    HighLifeMan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Get used to it.

    Calgary could be placed ahead of any of the last six teams.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2011
  8. Nihiliste

    Nihiliste Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    7,250
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    66
    The thing about the Avs is that they've had a ton of prospects graduate in the last two years, and several more will probably make the jump next season (whoever's picked at #2 + 1 one of elliott/barrie + hishon may also see NHL time next year). Guys like Duchene, O'reilly, Galiardi, Cumiskey, etc. graduated, and then Stewart, Shattenkirk and Cohen were traded. Because right now they're rebuilding and funneling talent through the system very quickly, their prospect depth doesn't seem great even though they're burgeoning with young talent as an organization.
     
  9. The K Man

    The K Man Registered User

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary
    Do they release each 1/3 daily?
     
  10. NobodyBeatsTheWiz

    NobodyBeatsTheWiz Happy now?

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Messages:
    22,599
    Likes Received:
    720
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    The Burbs
    I really don't see the point in doing this just over a month before the draft, as each teams prospect pool will be significantly different very soon.

    And I'll throw out the standard "My team's prospects are underrated" for the Caps.
     
  11. danishh

    danishh Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    32,990
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    187
    Location:
    YOW
    who did pittsburgh bribe to be as high as 21?

    as for calgary, i'm not sure i'd place them dead last, but a spot in the bottom 5 is certainly deserved.
     
  12. thestonedkoala

    thestonedkoala Everyone! PANIC!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    20,437
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Wow...uh what?

    You guys don't even follow the Wild. Just admit it.

    Zucker? Haula?

    Little depth in goal?

    Hackett, Kuemper, Gustafsson, Endras....that's little depth in goal? Really? So what is a lot of depth? Five first round goaltenders? 10 goaltenders?

    The only thing you guys got right is the RW is a concern for Minnesota.

    As for age:

    Not really. Scandy, Cuma are fairly 'old' for prospects. But Haula, Hackett, Kuemper, Larsson, Granlund, Bulmer are fairly young...we have a good mix.

    Please get someone intelligible to write the write ups for Minnesota.
     
  13. HighLifeMan

    HighLifeMan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    71
    I agree.

    And yes IMO the Caps should be higher as well.
     
  14. Chimaera

    Chimaera same ol' Caps

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    24,322
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    La Plata, Maryland
    On Kuznetsov alone, the Caps should be higher. Throw in Eakin, Holtby and Orlov, and I think there's a case that they're stronger than a few others.

    I don't particularly care, because they have graduated a lot of their prospects, but there is no way I take the Pens prospects over the Caps.'


    As for doing it now, or later, I think now is ok. The seasons are over, you can make a judgement on which prospects have improved and which haven't. If you throw in the draft, it's pretty much a crap shoot for some teams (though some will obviously get better with top 10 picks) but it's a better justification on those players once you've went through a season.
     
  15. OilerOlli*

    OilerOlli* Guest

    Minnesota is a bit too low, imo. They have some interesting prospects, liek Granlund or Zucker.
     
  16. OilerOlli*

    OilerOlli* Guest

    The Oilers will be in the 11-20 area.
    Hall and Eberle are graduated, no?
     
  17. A little shocked to see the Habs not in the bottom 10, as we weren't that high in the organizational rankings even with Subban and Eller. I guess we have a lot of depth at every position but goaltender though. There's not way we've risen and I thought losing those two along with Pyatt would cause us to drop more than 4 spots, the lowest we can fall. I guess the signings of Berger/Diaz might partially off-set that though. Plus the monster season of Gallagher and such.

    Still though, Washington should be higher, or maybe I'm not crediting other prospect pools enough.
     
  18. team_alex

    team_alex Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Brunswick
    Solid list.

    Very much appreciated. Although, I know it's always done like this, but I'm not a big fan of starting at #1 and working your way through the list. It kills the suspense and is therefore less of a good read.

    But the info is great.
     
  19. Warm Cookies

    Warm Cookies Brennan Izza Gangsta

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    62,845
    Likes Received:
    5,691
    Trophy Points:
    186
    The Pens don't have a lot of fancy names, but they do have depth and a good balance between potential and NHL-readiness (an often-underrated attribute) at each position.
     
  20. LickTheEnvelope

    LickTheEnvelope 7th Overall is my jam

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    31,089
    Likes Received:
    317
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Not sure if I agree with the Nucks rank.

    I'd probably put them around where they were last year at 22.

    No mention anywhere of Darren Archibald who was on a tear in the OHL playoffs or Sebastian Erixon who led Timra in D scoring.

    Also
    ???? Luongo, Schneider, Lack, Cannata

    Luongo: 38-15-7, 2.11 GAA, .928 save %
    Schneider: 16-4-2, 2.23 GAA, .929 save %
    Lack: 28-21-4, 2.26 GAA, .926 save %
    Cannata: 25-10-4, 2.48 GAA, .911 save %
     
  21. MountainGoat

    MountainGoat Guest

    I wonder where the Devils will end up, Tedenby probably moved us up a little from last year, Merrill too
     
  22. Placebo Effect

    Placebo Effect Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    7,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Your Mind
    These rankings are about as accurate as Scott Burnside's round 2 playoff predictions.
     
  23. wej20

    wej20 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    26,201
    Likes Received:
    335
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    Bracknell,UK
    Surprised Pens are above the Caps, I guess the Caps had a lot of there top guys graduating to the NHL. Bit unfair really as Dustin Jeffrey would have graduated if it hadn't been for injury. Pens are probably benefiting from the fact that they've got a lot of guys close to the NHL.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2011
  24. McMatthews

    McMatthews Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    10,510
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    6
    Weren't you the guy that was in love with Matt Foy?

    Dupuis > Kovalchuk.

    LOL.

    This is dating back to 2002.
     
  25. birddog*

    birddog* Guest

    Washington should be higher -- ahead of Pittsburg. Their top 5 is better then the Pens.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"