Hitman said:It makes me cringe seeing that Andrei Medvedev is considered a top prospect for Calgary.
didn't realize 19 was 'so high'X-SHARKIE said:This list is getting ulgy. Flames? Why are they so high? Ouch, Sabres top 10? Please.
Panthers are so low.
This is a bad list, i'm sorry just an ugly llist.
Flames Draft Watcher said:Why?
He is.
Flames Draft Watcher said:Definitely appreciate the hard work but the Calgary write up is extremely disappointing.
Phaneuf is a "stay at home" defensemen? He's currently 2nd on his TEAM in scoring (both points and goals) and that's only because he missed some time at the World Juniors. He was their leading scorer when he left. He's currently the 5th highest scoring defensemen in the WHL at age 18. He had superb totals at age 17 as well with 16 goals and another 7 in the playoffs.
That's a BAD mistake. But not nearly as bad as calling Tim Ramholt a stay at home defensemen which the writeup then proceeds to do. I've watched the kid in camp and he's a skilled puck rushing defensemen. Calling him a stay at homer couldn't be further from the truth. He's got 29 points in 34 games this season.
Disappointed that Yuri Trubachev doesn't deserve even a mention despite the fact that Sutter called him one of our top 5 prospects before last draft.
But calling Phaneuf and Ramholt "stay at home" defensemen is an embarassing mistake and one that should be rectified immediately. I have to question whether the writer knows much of anything about those two or has seen them play at all.
Hockey's Future said:Defensively the Stars have two highly skilled, undersized prospects in Trevor Daley and Martin Vagner.
Flames Draft Watcher said:Definitely appreciate the hard work but the Calgary write up is extremely disappointing.
Phaneuf is a "stay at home" defensemen? I have to question whether the writer knows much of anything about those two or has seen them play at all.
GuyF said:The CGY write up was done by a Calgarian in fact.
Phaneuf puts up numbers but I wouldn't call him an offensive defenceman either. He has a great shot from the point but he's not a Phil Housley or a Scott Niedermeyer. I don't think it's a insult to call him a defensive d-man... maybe a defensive d-man with offensive upside? Better?
JasonMacIsaac said:LA lost Frolov, Cammerelli and Brown.
X-SHARKIE said:This list is getting ulgy. Flames? Why are they so high? Ouch, Sabres top 10? Please.
Panthers are so low.
This is a bad list, i'm sorry just an ugly llist.