Further to those Olympics...What if Lindros' shot goes inside the post in the '98 Olympic shootout against Hasek and Roy stops Reichel? Would Canada go on to win gold and the whole dramatic Salt Lake victory is never-to-be?
What if Bobby Orr rejected Boston and signed with either Detroit, Montreal or Toronto as a youth?
What if Gretzky and Co. remained with the Oilers for the entirety of their careers? The damage Peter Pocklington did to hockey history....
Does hockey "expand" in "warm weather" climates if Gretzky never goes to the Kings? (e.g. No Sharks, Ducks, Panthers, Lightning)
That wouldve happened regardless. Expansion to Florida, Bay area. Ducks maybe not. Im 50/50 on that one. While not the most popular side of the opinion & argument I've always considered it a "myth" that Gretzky's landing in LA was responsible for the growth of the NHL & game in Florida, so called "SunBelt Experiment", a term that is pretty much a misnomer used by critics of NHL Expansion & Relocations (AZ, TX). He (Gretzky) certainly raised the profile of the Kings and sure, did inspire kids to take up the game (those who could afford it in warmer climes; and checkout those costs if you have the stomach). But to attribute all that some do to "The Trade" & the "Gretzky Factor", like he was a Genuine Rainmaker... not buyin. Overstated.
I don't know who was NHL commish at the time (Ziegler, Stein) etc but I remember seeing something that Bruce McNall kinda put the "bug in the ear" or something to that effect of having games played in "neutral" sites (e.g. Cleveland, Ohio). I guess with McNall landing Gretzky other owners wanted to listen to his ideas or something (because he became "big man on campus.") I don't know if McNall talked warm weather places too etc.
What if Pavel Bure's knee had stayed healthy?
Yeah, he rapidly ascended the rungs in the NHL, becoming Chairman of the Expansion & Relocation Committee, weilding quite a bit of influence.
... and by 1992, chairman of the Board of Governors itself. (A post he resigned about a year-and-a-half later after he defaulted on $90,000,000 loans.)
I agree with you: expansion would have happened anyway. People like to believe that the Gretzky trade raised hockey's profile (which it almost certainly did) and Bettman therefore okayed the expansion to "the sunbelt", but the truth is likely far less dramatic: the owners saw empty arenas and dollar signs. They followed the money.
...they needed the $$$, followed where it led, classic cases of Checkbook Expansion, pay the fixed price, you dont dicker, then justified with some logic but primarily emotion thereafter. Not in every case of course but in some.
Mm-hmm. People should read up on how the Senators and Lightning were founded. The owners didn't give a damn where the money came from just as long as the cheques cleared.
The worst part about snubbing Karmanos's bid was that Espo spent a lot of time submarining it by arguing how terrible the Florida Suncoast Dome, later the Thunderdome, was for hockey—even though he's the one who had orchestrated an exhibition game there in 1990. Karmanos secured an exclusive lease agreement that forbade Esposito's group from playing there. The Lightning played at the state fairgrounds their first season... and then leased the Suncoast Dome!
Esposito had no money backing his bid until the mysterious Japanese group stepped in days before he presented to the NHL. He had no lease to an arena, and no definitive plans for a new one. He crapped all over the Suncoast Dome as a potential venue. But, he agreed to pay the $5,000,000 up front and rest of the $50,000,000 expansion fee on schedule, so his bid won.
To this day, as far as anyone can tell, the Japanese firm Kokusai Green had no other assets than its ownership of the Lightning, and no one can confirm whether nominal owner Takashi Okubo ever even existed. Nothing had been proven in court as far as I know, but it seems everyone else involved suspected it was just a Yakuza money-laundering front.
I think whether Gretzky went to LA or not is pretty much irrelevant to the story: it has always been about money, and the NHL was notoriously bad about vetting potential ownership groups. They don't care where the money comes from, as long as they get their 'cut'.
What if Frank and Lester Patrick had decided to live comfortably off their father’s lumber fortune, never moved to the west coast, never started the PCHL ....... those boys are pretty much the creators of modern hockey as we know it. They gave us the blue line, the forward pass, goaltenders going down to make saves — I’ve read they are responsible for 22 current NHL rules.
Second what if: A violent snowstorm kept Lord Stanley of Preston home in Ottawa instead of with the kiddies at the Winter Carnival in Quebec .....would we have the Rideau Rebels? The Stanley Cup? Would his Lorship’s boys have turned to curling instead?
No dominating a league with 30 teams would've been significantly more impressive. But it didn't happenAgain, I agree (although he would still be looking up at Gordie).
After the top six, does it really matter how many teams you add on? Gordie would have dominated a six team league or a 100 team league.No dominating a league with 30 teams would've been significantly more impressive. But it didn't happen