Hockey's Biggest "What if"?

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,931
5,818
Visit site
What do you think is the biggest "what if" in hockey history?

What if Orr had healthier knees?

What if Mario could have played more full seasons in his prime?

What Bobby Hull doesn't go to the WHL?

What if Lindros could play with his head up?

What if Forsberg could have been more healthier?

What if Crosby didn't miss so much time at his peak?

Any other big ones?
 

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,574
10,163
Melonville
If Orr and Bobby Hull (or even just one of them) were healthy enough to play against the Soviets in '72...

Canada wins by a minimum of 6 games to 2 (a sweep or 7 games to 1 isn't out of the question).

Maybe, just maybe, that leads to the following scenarios:

Paul Henderson remains totally forgotten by history
Esposito's legacy falls down a notch
The Canada/Soviet rivalry never takes hold
The Canada Cup never happens
 
  • Like
Reactions: rfournier103

brachyrynchos

Registered User
Apr 10, 2017
1,472
998
With the 1st pick in the 1984 draft, out of Laval, the New Jersey Devils are proud to select Mario Lemieux.
Honorable mentions- Where Lindros ends up
-No lockout in 94-95
-Stevens stays in Washington
-Competition is a good thing, I've always been curious to how the WHA would've fared if half of the NHL
players drafted by the W went there, and I liked the IHL, too.
-How teams in the past would've benefitted from the modern playoff brackets...like the Whalers.
-Bossy's back holds up a little longer,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cygnusx1018

c9777666

Registered User
Aug 31, 2016
19,892
5,875
What if Quebec had drafted someone not named Eric Lindros in the 1991 draft?
 

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,294
12,975
Toronto, Ontario
If Orr and Bobby Hull (or even just one of them) were healthy enough to play against the Soviets in '72...

Canada wins by a minimum of 6 games to 2 (a sweep or 7 games to 1 isn't out of the question).

Maybe, just maybe, that leads to the following scenarios:

Paul Henderson remains totally forgotten by history
Esposito's legacy falls down a notch
The Canada/Soviet rivalry never takes hold
The Canada Cup never happens

I don't think adding Bobby Hull moves the needle much, if at all.

Bobby is the kind of guy that would have taken the Russians lightly and treated the series like a vacation to Russia.
 

brachyrynchos

Registered User
Apr 10, 2017
1,472
998
A bigger question what if Carl Racki could skate? Would he of had a shot at the big leagues?
Racki actually wasn't that bad, the problem (I could be wrong) is that his coaches seemed to solely develop him as a goon. His talent was there, he just never got the chance to prove himself. Rumor had it he was set to train with Doug Dorsey at one point which I'd like to think would've helped Racki's mobility. Dorsey ended up with Kate Moseley as a pair in figure skating for the US in late 80's early '90s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nnynetpotato

Say Hey Kid

Under the Sign of the Black Mark
Dec 10, 2007
23,822
5,623
Bathory
If Orr and Bobby Hull (or even just one of them) were healthy enough to play against the Soviets in '72...Canada wins by a minimum of 6 games to 2 (a sweep or 7 games to 1 isn't out of the question). ...
Nope. Team Canada had enough skill. Matching the Soviet's fitness and conditioning was the problem.
 

Kyle McMahon

Registered User
May 10, 2006
13,301
4,353
What if the Rangers would have signed Gordie Howe after his tryout?

Has to be the biggest one mentioned so far.

Stuff like Orr/Lemieux/Crosby being healthier doesn't really change history, per se. Maybe more career stats and an extra championship for the respective franchise, but it's not like they retired at age 22 or something and we never knew what they could have done.

Gordie Howe on the Rangers legitimately alters the course of NHL history. Detroit is still a great team in the 1950's, but are they great enough to win multiple Cups? Does Montreal fill that vacuum and go Boston Celtics 8 or 9 in a row? Or is a Rangers team with Howe able to win Cups in the 50's? Do the Rangers become a complete disaster throughout the 60's? Probably not, but now there's a chance the Red Wings do. Could that post-expansion Rangers team with Ratelle and Park emerging have won a Cup with an old, but still elite Gordie Howe in the fold? Does hockey become a major sport in the US decades earlier if the game's greatest star was on Broadway?
 

streitz

Registered User
Jul 22, 2018
1,258
319
Racki actually wasn't that bad, the problem (I could be wrong) is that his coaches seemed to solely develop him as a goon. His talent was there, he just never got the chance to prove himself. Rumor had it he was set to train with Doug Dorsey at one point which I'd like to think would've helped Racki's mobility. Dorsey ended up with Kate Moseley as a pair in figure skating for the US in late 80's early '90s.


I mean Derek Sutton had like 90 goals that year before he was taken out in the playoffs....Career over before it even began.
 

crobro

Registered User
Aug 8, 2008
3,873
720
If Guy Lafleur trade to Edmonton in 84 was not sabotaged by Serge Savard
 

brachyrynchos

Registered User
Apr 10, 2017
1,472
998
I mean Derek Sutton had like 90 goals that year before he was taken out in the playoffs....Career over before it even began.
Absolutely. I laugh when I hear people say Crosby, Ovechkin, and Mcdavid are generational, they never saw Sutton play, we did therefore we know,like how the refs were paid off to look the other way. No different than what happened with Denis Lemieux He would've posted better numbers if the Chief's privacy policy allowed him to know who owns the Chiefs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marotte Marauder

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
13,635
18,464
Las Vegas
Has to be the biggest one mentioned so far.

Stuff like Orr/Lemieux/Crosby being healthier doesn't really change history, per se. Maybe more career stats and an extra championship for the respective franchise, but it's not like they retired at age 22 or something and we never knew what they could have done.

Gordie Howe on the Rangers legitimately alters the course of NHL history. Detroit is still a great team in the 1950's, but are they great enough to win multiple Cups? Does Montreal fill that vacuum and go Boston Celtics 8 or 9 in a row? Or is a Rangers team with Howe able to win Cups in the 50's? Do the Rangers become a complete disaster throughout the 60's? Probably not, but now there's a chance the Red Wings do. Could that post-expansion Rangers team with Ratelle and Park emerging have won a Cup with an old, but still elite Gordie Howe in the fold? Does hockey become a major sport in the US decades earlier if the game's greatest star was on Broadway?

actually, Orr basically did...

Orr's final full season of hockey was age 26...for comparison, Karlsson is 27. After that he only plays in 36 games over the next 3 seasons combined.

By age 26 he already had:

8x Norris
3x Hart
2x Cup
2x Smythe
2x Ross
8x AS-1
Calder
915 pts in 657 games (1.39 ppg)

If they had simple arthroscopic knee surgery back then, Orr misses 6 months and is healthy after. If Orr gets to play until 35, that means he retires in 1985. So he gets to play in the high flying 80s AND play with Ray Bourque

Also, dont forget that Orr played his entire career with damaged knees. The injuries started his sophomore year (1968)...Orr played more than 75 games in a season only 4x

It is not unreasonable to think that the Orr/Gretzky debate is considered truly neck and neck if Orr has a full career. Youre looking at:

- at least 1,500 points
- 3-6 Harts
- 12-15 Norris
- 2-5 Ross
- 2-4 Cups (Boston for sure beats Montreal in 78 and 79 with him)
- 2-4 Smythe
- 12-15 AS-1
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mbraunm and Mallow

streitz

Registered User
Jul 22, 2018
1,258
319
Absolutely. I laugh when I hear people say Crosby, Ovechkin, and Mcdavid are generational, they never saw Sutton play, we did therefore we know,like how the refs were paid off to look the other way. No different than what happened with Denis Lemieux He would've posted better numbers if the Chief's privacy policy allowed him to know who owns the Chiefs.


Problem with Denis Lemieux was he was too mentally soft. When he was backstopping a goon team who could clear the crease he was serviceable but very mentally fragile. Sort of like Charlie Conway, just too mentally soft for the big leagues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agentblack

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad