HabsFanFromOntario
Registered User
- May 7, 2011
- 1,047
- 0
Minnesota hates people who low ball their players. Just because they don't get as much publicity doesnt mean their aren't quality players.
Minnesota hates people who low ball their players. Just because they don't get as much publicity doesnt mean their aren't quality players.
vetoed i did not approve this....
ALL deals need to be approved by me to be announced...
Some of you guys need to review the rules for this game. Please take a minute to go back to the first page to read them again.
A few things:
-ALL trades need to be sent and approved by me
-Only trades with NTCs and NMCs have to be accepted by 2 out of the 3 (Main, Co, and Co) Commisioners
-And when asking to waive a player include the full trade.
- 1 more thing, try not to make trades with so many players involved, keep it a maximum of 4 being traded from the same team at a time....
I have set the starting day of this game on this Tuesday, so thats when trades will start to be announced.
Trades don't need to be approved by Gary Bettman. I think that rule is a tad ridiculos. Deals can be vetoed if they make no sense or are brutally one-sided, but when some of us are just making good, quality deals with no clauses, I don't think we need you to tell us that they're okay.
Thats just my opinion, and I assumed we could post because DTMB told me I could send in the deals.
Bolded. i didn't say announce...
Trades don't need to be approved by Gary Bettman. I think that rule is a tad ridiculos. Deals can be vetoed if they make no sense or are brutally one-sided, but when some of us are just making good, quality deals with no clauses, I don't think we need you to tell us that they're okay.
Thats just my opinion, and I assumed we could post because DTMB told me I could send in the deals.
Yes, and I ASSUMED we could post. ASSUMED. Not directly saw it written on my computer screen that you said "Announce deals", but ASSUMED.
i say this so their isnt ridiculous trades being posted and many of us have seen these terrible trades in previous games and know what im talking about so the purpose is exactly that to avoid bad trades, I'm not saying you do bad trades but what I'm saying is I want to avoid the possibility of them happening....
I think its more of a hassel to wait around for you to approve a "4th rounder for Krys Barch" deal then have you veto a obviously flawed deal.
Once again, my opinion, you game, but just saying, its just extra wait time on easy trades.
well i care to disagree, when u announce bad trades other GMs react to it and it doesn't go well. I'd rather be on the safe side and see every deal first before being announced to make the game go smoothly...
See if you think that when some GMs give you **** for making them wait on a small deal that would trigger a large one, but then can't do the large one, because the wait time allowed someone to create a unmatchable offer for the large deal.
Its a silly rule, and the are now open.
See if you think that when some GMs give you **** for making them wait on a small deal that would trigger a large one, but then can't do the large one, because the wait time allowed someone to create a unmatchable offer for the large deal.
Its a silly rule, and the are now open.
wait so my deal is shut down?
No its not cuz De Haan and Hammonic were used in another deal for a big time player and i wouldnt have had to move them if i woulda had Striet in the deal so now i lose Hammonic and De Haan but still have Striet and Parenteau but lose Semin I had the set up for a nice looking team but this just killed it