bruins4777*
Guest
Zajac should be higher,schnieder should be higher, stafford should be higher, montoya should be lower, stuart should be higher, and thats all that immediately comes to mind.
Man, go back and look at the posts. You're the one doing some major leauge whining about Zajac.Jason MacIsaac said:You wouldn't see them if there was actually an argument from the other side how Chucko will is the better prospect other then the constant moaning that MrMastodonFarm has been bringing to this thread.
How many times have you seen him play again?DownFromNJ said:I have no faith in Jessiman, and I can't see anything to justify his high rating.
I brought an argument, you bring nothing.MrMastodonFarm said:Man, go back and look at the posts. You're the one doing some major leauge whining about Zajac.
Jason MacIsaac said:it is clear he is a better prospect then Jessiman, Howard, Greene and Nystrom.
How many times have you seen him play again?
Well name something wrong with his game. The only I can find is that he passes when he probably should shoot but by the look of his numbers it seems to work.tomerez said:Nothing is clear when it comes to prospects.
Secondly, not that I don't think Zajac should be higher, because I do, but your homerism needs to stop. Absolutely no flaws to his game? That's just silly.
I like Zajac and value him over several of the prospects that are ranked ahead of him, but in no way do I think he's a perfect prospect.
I know I came off as a wise-ass, but I didn't mean to. And I'm not impressed with him, either. And he is a Ranger prospect.DownFromNJ said:Twice live and twice on TV. Never impressed. He never has put up significant stats. And he's a Ranger, which gives him the jinx.
From what I read and listen on radio broadcast Zajac and Stafford are the only players that drive the net. That may not count as physical game but he has a few tip in goals and alot of goals created from going to the net. His physical game will come, he needs to fill out some more. 6`3 195 is still too thin.tomerez said:I don't think he's physically perfect. From what I've seen he isn't the physical presence that a "flawless" player would entitle.
Jason MacIsaac said:From what I read and listen on radio broadcast Zajac and Stafford are the only players that drive the net. That may not count as physical game but he has a few tip in goals and alot of goals created from going to the net. His physical game will come, he needs to fill out some more. 6`3 195 is still too thin.
Jason MacIsaac said:From what I read and listen on radio broadcast Zajac and Stafford are the only players that drive the net. That may not count as physical game but he has a few tip in goals and alot of goals created from going to the net. His physical game will come, he needs to fill out some more. 6`3 195 is still too thin.
pfft, that chump only has 23-8-31 in 25 games. he really stinks and that's why he didn't make the listbruins4777 said:Anyways, why isn't ben walter on the list? I thought he has like a goal a game or something?
Jason MacIsaac said:Ask any sioux fan how he played last series. He was the best player by a good margin. He was allways a threat shorthanded, set up his linemates far too many times and was physical.
Jason MacIsaac said:Stafford had a year and a half to show his best, Zajac is only a freshmen and I think this second half we will eally see him take off. His last 4 games have been nothing short of remarkable two way hockey. Thats while hitting 3 posts, 2 shorthanded. Potential I don't know if there are many from the 2004 draft that matches Zajac, Ovehckin and Malkin are obvious but I even think Zajac has more NHL potential then Parise. Thats saying alot.
bruins4777 said:Zajac should be higher,schnieder should be higher, stafford should be higher, montoya should be lower, stuart should be higher, and thats all that immediately comes to mind.
Yes I have seen Zajac play, only once...I don't expect to be an expert on the kid but the people I talk to on other forums are. They seen him play all year. If I were only going by stats then Zajac wouldn't seem as good as I am ranting about. His offense has actually been a little bit of a let down for me. Its his allround play that is getting people excited. If his linemates could finish some plays he would be well over the 30 point plateau. Stafford has had a horrible year in terms of goals.Kovy274Hart said:Have you seen Zajac play? If I did, I'd give an opinion. But I haven't.
On Stafford, he was Team USA's best player. He could play in any situation and really made things happen. Was very impressed.
One thing you're ignoring is that Zajac is older than Stafford despite being a freshman.
On Chucko, I came away very impressed with him in the games I've seen. It's not all about "stats" Jason. But it's about how he plays. Chucko plays a very physical style and looks like a budding power forward. He's playing on one of the best NCAA lines this year with Irmen and Potulny. Not many schools have been able to deal with them. Chucko is a big part of it despite being a freshman.
He has high potential IMO.
Is the list debatable? Sure. Montoya has struggled this year and is said to be playing with a bad ankle. Jessiman is hurt. But people who talk him down make it sound like he didn't produce last year. He did alright. Hopefully, he bounces back with an injury.
Oh, and based on what I've seen, Irmen and Potulny should be rated in the top ten.
If Hensick was already drafted, he'd make the list as well. So would Marty Sertich.
I think I have a firm enough grip on the situation.Vaive-Alive said:Get a grip.
Great explanation and reasoning.ryanlambert said:Ben Walter > Hugh Jessiman
Broadway Crosby said:Great explanation and reasoning.
Jessiman has the potential to be a star, but could easliy be a bust. Walter doesn't have NEAR the potential of Jessiman.
Please explain why you said that Walter is a better prospect than Jessiman.
umm, it's about looking at the numbers.Broadway Crosby said:Great explanation and reasoning.
Jessiman has the potential to be a star, but could easliy be a bust. Walter doesn't have NEAR the potential of Jessiman.
Please explain why you said that Walter is a better prospect than Jessiman.