HF's top-10 horror films of all time: #1

Select up to 2 films

  • Cat People (Tourneur, 1942)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • House of Wax (De Toth, 1953)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Invasion of the Body Snatchers (Siegel, 1956)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Scream (Craven, 1996)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Se7en (Fincher, 1995)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hereditary (Aster, 2018)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    39
  • Poll closed .

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,844
2,704
No need to propose other selections, these films are the winners of each decade's polls.

Please refrain from posting your own personnal top-10 until the last poll (if I get there!)

I'll replace each winner with the next film in line from its decade.
 

Trap Jesus

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
28,686
13,457
I went with The Thing and The Witch, I think those are my top 2 even outside of HF's favorites (at least of movies I would definitely consider horror).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Violenza Domestica

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,542
3,400
Many good choices (obviously), but went with Night of the Living Dead. Great not just on its own merits, but widely influential as well. It effectively creates an entire subgenre. It's a prime example of horror's ability to Trojan horse real world issues/thoughts into the fantastic (even if in this case it was a little more luck than skill) and be something more than just blood and guts. Beyond horror-specific issues, I think it's still a hallmark for down-and-dirty, low-budget indie filmmaking regardless of genre.

Honorable mention: Psycho, The Exorcist
 
  • Like
Reactions: Violenza Domestica

Newsworthy

Registered User
Jan 28, 2018
4,253
982
USA
So many great choices and so many great films.
Went with "Night" because of its impact on culture today and to me that's truly
definition of horror.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,542
3,400
I hope this doesn't derail the thread here, but a thought occurred to me and it's somewhat relevant given the two movies involved. Was in a discussion yesterday about Psycho and it occurred to me that I rarely see it challenged as being "not horror." As far as I can tell it's universally embraced as a horror movie. Then you have Silence of the Lambs, which I think certainly qualifies as horror though I understand when people want to say "well, it's really more of a thriller ..." I sorta feel that way myself, though I have no objection to its inclusion in horror discussions.

Are they really that different?
Why is one almost unquestionably horror while the other is seen as kinda/sorta horror?

Not sure I have an answer. Curious what others think.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,322
9,810
I hope this doesn't derail the thread here, but a thought occurred to me and it's somewhat relevant given the two movies involved. Was in a discussion yesterday about Psycho and it occurred to me that I rarely see it challenged as being "not horror." As far as I can tell it's universally embraced as a horror movie. Then you have Silence of the Lambs, which I think certainly qualifies as horror though I understand when people want to say "well, it's really more of a thriller ..." I sorta feel that way myself, though I have no objection to its inclusion in horror discussions.

Are they really that different?
Why is one almost unquestionably horror while the other is seen as kinda/sorta horror?

Not sure I have an answer. Curious what others think.

Perhaps it's because Psycho definitely counted as horror in 1960 and went on to be hugely influential to the horror genre. 'Silence', on the other hand, came out after slasher films and such changed the perception of what "horror" is and wasn't nearly as influential to the genre (or was influential to only a sub-genre, the psychological horror). If 'Silence' had come out in 1960 and Psycho in 1991, they might both be perceived the way that the other is.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
95,981
60,463
Ottawa, ON
I also have a hard time with some of these definitions.

Silence of the Lambs and Jaws are right up there, but I'm not sure I'd call them horror films. Aliens is a science fiction action thriller.

I ended up voting for the Shining, but as a film I might put it behind some of the others. Alien was pretty impressive - I might have voted for it instead.
 
Last edited:

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
42,771
10,316
Toronto
I also have a hard time with some of these definitions.

Silence of the Lambs and Jaws are right up there, but I'm not sure I'd call them horror films. Aliens is a science fiction action thriller.

I ended up voting for the Shining, but as a film I might put it behind some of the others.
Both should have an asterisk beside their title claiming "Can also be viewed as a horror film." I agree. I never think of them as horror films either, but clearly they are. Psycho killer tries to outsmart federal agent; giant shark menaces New England beach--that's horrifying material to me, even if the horror is derived from a non-traditional approach to genre conventions.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad