HFBoards TOP 50 Prospects Ranking #12 (closed)

[amnesiac]

TOP 50 PROSPECTS


Criteria is 22 and under, 30 NHL GP or less, no goalies

1. Trevor Zegras - C		18.		35.
2. Moritz Seider - D		19.		36.
3. Quinton Byfield - C		20.		37.
4. Cole Caufield - RW		21.		38.
5. Owen Power - D		22.		39.
6. Jamie Drysdale - D		23.		40.
7. Bowen Byram - D		24.		41.
8. Anton Lundell - C		25.		42.
9. Matthew Beniers - C		26.		43.
10. Jake Sanderson - D		27.		44.
11. Lucas Raymond - RW		28.		45.
12.		29.		46.
13.		30.		47.
14.		31.		48.
15.		32.		49.
16.		33.		50.
17.		34

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

to add:
V.Kravtsov - NYR
C.York - PHI
C.McMichael - WSH
I.Morozov - VGK
D.Farrance - NSH
S.Pinto - OTT
C.Zary - CPG
V.Soderstrom - ARI
Y.Chinakhov - CLB
V.Podkolzin - VAN
PO Joseph - PIT
G.Denisenko - FLA
D.Mercer - NJD
J.Berggren - DET
T.Bordeleau - SJS
K.Johnson - CLB
K.Guhle - MTL
JJ Peterka - BUF
N.Robertson - TOR
P.Broberg - EDM
T.Harley - DAL
B.Faber - LAK
C.Sillinger - CLB


past lists:
HFBoards TOP 75 Prospects Ranking #75 (FINAL) (2020)
HFBoards TOP 50 Prospects (2019)

Click to read more...

 

[amnesiac]

Boldy
Lundkvist
Eklund
Krebs
Rossi

 

[majormajor]

Boldy
Lundkvist
Eklund
Krebs
Rossi

Boldy goes first here for me too, after that I get the idea that Lundkvist might be very overrated. Might he be more of a PP specialist in the NHL? I'd welcome clarification from SHL watchers.

Then this is where I have the big cluster of 2021s. I get you want to put the tenured blue chippers first but they're all gone after Boldy. Rossi for instance hasn't played since he was drafted so he doesn't go ahead of comparable prospects from this year.

 

[ted2019]

Boldy.

 

[Pavels Dog]

Boldy goes first here for me too, after that I get the idea that Lundkvist might be very overrated. Might he be more of a PP specialist in the NHL? I'd welcome clarification from SHL watchers.

Lundkvist has been a bit overrated by Rangers fans for a while. Filip Hronek is a decent NHL comparable. Should probably land in the #15-20 range here I'd say.

 

[Stewie Griffin]

Boldy. Then Eklund. He shouldn't be too far behind Raymond given their SHL stats.

 

[Quinnisinoverhishead]

Boldy
Lundkvist
Eklund
Krebs
Rossi

Like that list. I would go:
Krebs
Boldy
Eklund
Lundkvist

I think they are all better than Raymond. Don't know how he went over that group.

 

[Isaac Nootin]

Newhook or Boldy, I prefer Newhook.

 

[Boreal01]

Krebs, Boldy and Eklund should have been selected before Raymond

Went with Krebs here

 

[Tkachuk Norris]

Heinola
Newhook

 

[RememberTheName]

Clarke, add Mercer

 

[BStinson]

Went with Perfetti.

Could see Boldy or Eklund challenging.

 

[Howe Elbows 9]

Lundkvist, Boldy, Krebs, Eklund and Newhook are some of my top options at this point.

 

[HanSolo]

Just my own personal observation, Krebs looked very good in his NHL debut. He looked like he walked in with all the skill and smarts to play on our second line immediately but was lacking in the size to handle it. Unfortunately he got the call up during a particularly streaky portion of the season for the VGK offensively and the third line has always been hit or miss even in the best of times. And ultimately he suffered a jaw injury that ended his season.

Still, Krebs' approach to the game demonstrated legit star potential. Given Vegas' cap situation, and Krebs being one of the only waiver exempt players that could play this year, it's likely that he'll spend the season growing his frame playing first line minutes in the AHL, but after that I'm fully expecting Krebs to be a huge add to the VGK roster.

Understand Boldy going here, but Krebs really shouldn't slip more than 5 spots from this point on.