Cam98
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2009
- 2,596
- 242
Last year he would of, this year is another story
Last year he still sucked defensively, so not sure how "last year he would" lol.
Last year he would of, this year is another story
You going to admit you were wrong yet? Or do you just prefer to ignore your mistakes?They’d comfortably be the 2nd best team in the Pacific again this year and pushing for 1st if divisions were normal.
They’re a good hockey team.
Not a Lightning or Bruins type caliber team but comfortably a playoff caliber team.
They’d comfortably be the 2nd best team in the Pacific again this year and pushing for 1st if divisions were normal.
They’re a good hockey team.
Not a Lightning or Bruins type caliber team but comfortably a playoff caliber team.
Point is, it appeared teams used the round robin as exhibition warmup games.... knowing they would move through.
The oilers on the other hand...
yeah the Oilers blew it...what's your point?Point is, it appeared teams used the round robin as exhibition warmup games.... knowing they would move through.
The oilers on the other hand...
Nothing to substantiate that claim, you can’t make guesses without actually playing the games. That’s like me saying Vancouver would comfortably be 1st in the pacific.
I nominate the 7-1 drubbing of the Lames. But their all so good! Gotta flip a 3 sided coin on this one.Which Oilers win did you guys enjoy better? The coming back from down 3 to win in regulation or the Mike Smith shutout?
Do you need to be reminded again that they are only playing against 1/4 of the league?Kind of ironic when you're the one that started making statements regarding the Oilers success being predicated on which division they play in, no?
They’re actually playing against 1/5 of the renaming teams .Do you need to be reminded again that they are only playing against 1/4 of the league?
So only you're allowed to make claims you can't substantiate?Do you need to be reminded again that they are only playing against 1/4 of the league?
Except the data is actually thereSo only you're allowed to make claims you can't substantiate?
You going to admit you were wrong yet? Or do you just prefer to ignore your mistakes?
How is that data there to support your claim, when they're only playing their own division?Except the data is actually there
Nothing to substantiate that claim, you can’t make guesses without actually playing the games. That’s like me saying Vancouver would comfortably be 1st in the pacific.
Do you need to be reminded again that they are only playing against 1/4 of the league?
That wasn’t Edler either, ahh you’re just blind! Your assessment makes a lot more sense now.
Hughes advanced stats don’t look like someone who got dominated though, weird I guess I’ll just trust you. You’ve shown you can’t read or hear, seems like the type of persons opinion I should value.
Alright alright alrightView attachment 400750 This was too good not to share