Prospect Info: HFBoards Canucks Prospect Rankings Since 2013

DomY

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
1,256
141
Id of ranked them differently:

1 Hughes
2 Madden
3 Demko
4 Hoglander
5 Podzkolin
6 Woo
7 Keppen
8 Lind
9 Rathbone
10 Dipietro
11 Macewan
12 Juolevi
13 Focht
14 Karlsson

I didnt rank Lockwood cause hes gonna go UFA next year, he unfortunately looks like he WONT be a Canuck

Yeah this is all ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilliBilly

ChilliBilly

Registered User
Aug 22, 2007
7,081
4,329
chilliwacki
Id of ranked them differently:

1 Hughes
2 Madden
3 Demko
4 Hoglander
5 Podzkolin
6 Woo
7 Keppen
8 Lind
9 Rathbone
10 Dipietro
11 Macewan
12 Juolevi
13 Focht
14 Karlsson

I didnt rank Lockwood cause hes gonna go UFA next year, he unfortunately looks like he WONT be a Canuck

1 - Podkolzin at 5? Should be 1 or 2.
2 - Juolevi at 12? He could still be our best D man in 2 or 3 years (admittedly highly unlikely but ...)
3 - Lind at 8? He is not looking like he will ever play in the NHL.
4 - Madden is just not that good. He "may" play in the NHL, whereas 3, 4 , 5, 6, 10 and 12 on this will almost for sure play multiple years in the NHL.

And no reason to write off lockwood yet. Let see how training camp goes this year.
 

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
May 25, 2014
45,287
30,123
Madden in the top 5!?! Don't know about that one. I like him as a prospect and all but that's pretty high.

At a bare minimum I can't see how you can put him above Demko who's already shown to be a competent back-up in the NHL. Demko's upside has been and continues to be a #1 goalie since we drafted him. What Demko has proven so far at the levels he has and the position he plays has got to put him above Madden at the very minimum IMO.
Yeah thats a good point, i will change it, Demko should be above him at this point, but I am still high on Madden
 
  • Like
Reactions: LovemyNucks

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
May 25, 2014
45,287
30,123
Yeah this is all ridiculous.
So you have a crystal ball to see in the future bub? There all PROSPECTS means you dont know for sure how thell do in the future if they have one even. Maybe im wrong maybe your wrong but not gonna say is ridiculous if someone disagrees with me on these

1 - Podkolzin at 5? Should be 1 or 2.
2 - Juolevi at 12? He could still be our best D man in 2 or 3 years (admittedly highly unlikely but ...)
3 - Lind at 8? He is not looking like he will ever play in the NHL.
4 - Madden is just not that good. He "may" play in the NHL, whereas 3, 4 , 5, 6, 10 and 12 on this will almost for sure play multiple years in the NHL.

And no reason to write off lockwood yet. Let see how training camp goes this year.
1 Thats your opinion. Terrible argument
2 Could be. Could be Hedman could be Pouliot. Could be could be. Three years later he sucks. Hope he turns out but til he shows anything i will rank him low
3 Yeah maybe your right, we will see
4 Ok, i accept it thats your opinion. I have mine
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->