Siludin
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2010
- 7,331
- 5,250
Anaheim frequently wins the great Alphabet WarNot really getting the Anaheim love. Nice group of forwards but their defence and goaltending is extremely mediocre.
Anaheim frequently wins the great Alphabet WarNot really getting the Anaheim love. Nice group of forwards but their defence and goaltending is extremely mediocre.
BUF does have some good talent, but many of their best prospects have already been promoted to the NHL. Maybe if this thread involved the Top players under 25 they might be Top 5, but with the current crop compared to the others it’ll be a few rounds before they’re seriously considered.
Not really getting the Anaheim love. Nice group of forwards but their defence and goaltending is extremely mediocre.
Could you really name 5 that are better though?
Not feeling the Sens love myself.
Do people not know who Glass, Krebs, Elvenes, Hague, Dorofeyev, Morozov, Korczak are ? Is that it ? I guess. A few of those are underrated prospects, but Glass could be the best player out of the NHL at the moment. This is crazy that theyre not voted in. Krebs was ranked as a top 10 prospect all year, Dorofeyev destroyed the MHL in scoring and played good in the KHL as a 18 years old.
Cody Glass is the best prospect left on the board, with Necas and Carolina doesn't have the quality depth to go against Vegas.
People are voting for Anaheim and Ottawa and thats crazy to me.
Glass vs Zegras vs Batherson is an easy Glass.
Hague vs Steel vs Brannstrom is Hague for me, but I can accept tie to Brannstrom/slight edge brannstrom.
Krebs vs Terry vs Brown is a landslide for Krebs
Dorofeyev vs Comtois vs JBD is either a three-way tie if you don't know much about Dorofeyev, or landslide if you've watched him.
Elvenes vs Lundestrom vs Thomson is close all over the board, IMO.
Morozov vs Tracey vs Norris is an edge to Tracey, pretty easily.
Korczak vs Jones vs Wolanin is a tie with Korczak and Jones IMO.
After that it does get murky and Vegas seems to lose most matchups as theyve traded a lot of picks away in the last three years, and they don't have any 16/15 picks, but the first four are so good that it's impossible to vote against them. People put too much weight on depth and not enough on the top prospects. A pool should be decided on your top prospect first and foremost and your top 5, 6 or 7, not top 15.[/B]
Yeah, wrong word to use, meant the depth of the top end or whatever. Theres a steep dropoff IMO after Necas. While the VGK have Krebs, Hague, Dorofeyev, Elvenes, Korczak and Morozov, who I'm higher on than most, the Canes have Puistola, Rees, Suzuki, then a steep drop off IMO. So the three don't really compare to me, and you also have a steep dropoff. Theres a lot of quantity, but I wouldn't say its quality.Really? They just stomped the AHL with the youngest team in the league last year
They don't just have a solid top end, they have what's likely by far the best depth left on the board.
Yeah, wrong word to use, meant the depth of the top end or whatever. Theres a steep dropoff IMO after Necas. While the VGK have Krebs, Hague, Dorofeyev, Elvenes, Korczak and Morozov, who I'm higher on than most, the Canes have Puistola, Rees, Suzuki, then a steep drop off IMO. So the three don't really compare to me, and you also have a steep dropoff. Theres a lot of quantity, but I wouldn't say its quality.
I don't agree. I am really not a fan of any of your first rounders aside from Necas, who I'm really high on, I don't put much weight on goaltending prospects and Rees and Drury are the only two I'm high on. Puistola and Fensore are really nice too, but again, nothing on Krebs, Dorofeyev, Korczak, Elvenes and Hague, even if you believe Glass and Necas are equal (I do).Quality and quantity is better on the Canes side. Four 1st round picks (Necas, Suzuki, Bean, Gauthier), eight 2nd round picks (Kuokkanen, Rees, Kochetkov, Nedeljkovic, Drury, Loustarinen, McKeown, Martin), three "swing for the fences" 3rd round picks this year (Puistola, Honka, Fensore), and multiple 3rd/later round picks who look like they have NHL talent (Geekie, Mattheos, and Sellgren).
Yeah I'm a little surprised by the lack of Sens love / even Sens hate. Batherson, Brown, Norris, Formenton, Brannstrom, JBD, Thomson, and 4 goalies with #1 potential is easily top 10 worthy.
Admittedly, they probably only boast two forwards capable of being 1st liners (Batherson/Brown), but the depth on D and G is outstanding.
Anaheim/Ottawa should be higher and Detroit way more down
Tbh, Ill chime in and say that I believe Anaheim does not have better forwards prospects than Detroit.Because nobody outside Detroit believes Veleno is a Top 6er. Or something.
Tbh, Ill chime in and say that I believe Anaheim does not have better forwards prospects than Detroit.
Detroit/Ottawa should be behind Vegas but clearly ahead of Anaheim.
Since were saying the same thing, does this mean you are wrong too?After seeing your list, tl;dr.
I think Edmonton should be up there due to their very very strong defensive depth for prospects. Forwards lower them down though