HF GM Games Fantasy Mock Draft #3 - Discussion III

Status
Not open for further replies.

ConnorMcMullet

#12 Colby Cave
Jun 10, 2017
10,293
18,030
Considering the priority on centers this game, I'm very surprised a certain player hasn't been taken yet. He's a decent 2C and better than some of the centers that have been taken already.
 

hockeynorth

Registered User
Aug 31, 2017
12,584
6,374
Considering the priority on centers this game, I'm very surprised a certain player hasn't been taken yet. He's a decent 2C and better than some of the centers that have been taken already.
Can you delete this please, I know who you mean. He'd really help my team.
 

OB5

Registered User
May 2, 2015
5,581
3,998
Real quandary with my next two picks. I need D and G but want C and W
 

Exquisite

Registered User
Feb 9, 2016
1,059
204
I think the lesson is to have trades be all or nothing. The complexity isn’t worth any gains it’s supposed to achieve.

My man. Yeah you worded it too complex

1 trade limit - completely fine

This was 4 trade limited game with hinderences so I feel just saying 3-4 trades allowed would have been an improvement
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blinny

Blinny

This is the Sway
Jan 6, 2010
1,769
1,420
Dorchester
My man. Yeah you worded it too complex

1 trade limit - completely fine

This was 4 trade limited game with hinderences so I feel just saying 3-4 trades allowed would have been an improvement

ya just having a set number of total trades without limitations works too. That way you can make 4 trades but they could be 4 big trades and not be limited to players or picks.
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
25,240
11,812
California
Might not have any wingers but Barzal-Giroux-Dvorak down the middle. Might move Giroux to Barzal’s wing though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OB5
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->