Help the blonde chick

[kimi]

Which are the 2 best prospects of the following?

M. Michalek
B. Coburn
A. Raycroft
R. Miller
M. Ribeiro
S. Crosby
C. Barker
E. Malkin
R. Schremp
T. Shishkavov
D. Hamhuis
Z. Parise

Thanks guys.

Click to read more...

 

[Douggy]

Tough Call. IMO:
- S. Crosby
- B. Coburn

HM: M. Michalek, R. Schremp, Z. Parise

 

[WesternEliteHockeyPr]

Sorry, I Prefer Brunettes Or Redheads!!!!

 

[august]

Tough one, but this is my list

S. Crosby
R. Miller
E. Malkin
M. Michalek
C. Barker
B. Coburn
Z. Parise
R. Schremp
D. Hamhuis
A. Raycroft
M. Ribeiro
T. Shishkavov

 

[Marshall]

If it was up to me, I'd take Crosby and Michalek

 

[kimi]

Sorry, I Prefer Brunettes Or Redheads!!!!

And I prefer men with an opinion. :p

 

[Rhett4]

And I prefer men with an opinion. :p

Crosby and Miller.

HM: Coburn, Michalek.

 

[Alex Kovalev]

I would probably go with Malkin and Crosby.

Malkin will challenge Ovechkin for 1st overall, though he will most likely be picked 2nd or maybe 3rd.

Crosby is going to be a great player, almost a sure thing that he will be 1st overall in 2005.

 

[Rattrick]

Crosby and Miller.

HM: Coburn, Michalek.

I second that.

 

[canucksfan]

I'd take Crosby and Barker

 

[Duff88]

Which are the 2 best prospects of the following?

M. Michalek
B. Coburn
A. Raycroft
R. Miller
M. Ribeiro
S. Crosby
C. Barker
E. Malkin
R. Schremp
T. Shishkavov
D. Hamhuis
Z. Parise

Thanks guys.

Mike Ribeiro can't be qualified as a prospect.

 

[goteam]

Top 2:
Crosby and Parise

 

[Kev88]

Which are the 2 best prospects of the following?

M. Michalek
B. Coburn
A. Raycroft
R. Miller
M. Ribeiro
S. Crosby
C. Barker
E. Malkin
R. Schremp
T. Shishkavov
D. Hamhuis
Z. Parise

Thanks guys.

I would say Crosby and Malkin. But it is very tough to tell who are the 2 best.

I could say Raycroft and Barker too.

Ribeiro would be one of my choices too, but he is a bit older than the other players of the list.

 

[Gags1288]

Which are the 2 best prospects of the following?

M. Michalek
B. Coburn
A. Raycroft
R. Miller
M. Ribeiro
S. Crosby
C. Barker
E. Malkin
R. Schremp
T. Shishkavov
D. Hamhuis
Z. Parise

Thanks guys.

Well Crosby's the easiest one, so basically we're just looking for one out the rest. Out of the rest, i'd say the candidates are miller, michalek, malkin, barker, and schremp. I think Malkin is the second best player in the next draft so that leaves malkin, miller, and michalek. Miller would be a decent choice, but I'll go Malkin for his offensive upside. So in the end, i'd take Crosby and Malkin.

 

[Cayouche5]

I say Malkin and Crosby
Crosby is almost sure to be the #1 pick in 2005 and Malkin is my favorite prospects in the '04 draft.
Parise is the other one who i can consider to be close of the 2 above.

 

[Patty Ice]

If it was up to me, I'd take Crosby and Michalek

Same here but Malkin gets a very close third.

 

[badtakemachine]

Redheads!!!!

Me too .

I'd say Coburn and Crosby.

 

[eSabre]

Crosby and Miller

 

[Hockeycrazed07]

Crosby and Malkin, with Michalek a close 3rd along with Barker.

I like girls that are breathing.

~Crazed.

 

[NYIschremp44]

schremp schremp schremp and in a close 4th, schremp

but after that you have schremp schremp and schremp! and then maybe crosby...

 

[Epsilon]

Crosby and Malkin, with Michalek a close 3rd along with Barker.

I like girls that are breathing.

~Crazed.

Agree with all of this.

 

[Crosbyfan]

schremp schremp schremp and in a close 4th, schremp

but after that you have schremp schremp and schremp! and then maybe crosby...

I'm keeping track. I've got you down as a Crosby first and a Schremp somewhat distant second. Did I get you right? I just wanted to be sure.

 

[Frolov]

1) S. Crosby
2) E. Malkin - M. Michalek
3) B. Coburn - R. Miller - A. Raycroft
4) R. Schremp - Z. Parise - D. Hamhuis
5) T. Shishkavov - C. Barker

M. Ribeiro isn't a prospect anymore

 

[NYIschremp44]

I'm keeping track. I've got you down as a Crosby first and a Schremp somewhat distant second. Did I get you right? I just wanted to be sure.

heres a math question for you what does 44+87 equal?

if you were going to answer 131 you're wrong, it equals a stanley cup ring!

 

[ChemiseBleuHonnete]

heres a math question for you what does 44+87 equal?

if you were going to answer 131 you're wrong, it equals a stanley cup ring!

hahaha good one!