GDT: Hawks @ Flames, Nov 3, HNIC

[Johnny Hoxville]

Chicago has some excellent top end pieces, but their depth is probably the worst in the entire NHL, followed by the Kings.

 

[super6646]

And there we go...

 

[MDCSL]

In what world is that a holding call?

 

[super6646]

Our PK sucks ass. f***ing stupid penalty...

 

[Bounces R Way]

Fack. Vali had to get that out off the faceoff

 

[joescores]

Care to elaborate on what you're trying to say?

Check the previous thread.

 

[super6646]

f***! Seriously...

 

[crazyfisherman]

We are having trouble with hawks forecheck

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

No call on Neal being hooked and no call when Rasmus was boarded. Then they score, good stuff..

 

[Janks]

Good screen by Ryan there on Rittich...

 

[Rubi]

Hawks are out working the Flames.

 

[Shawnofthedeadz]

Knew that was coming, we were looking awful at the end of the period. Call missed on Neal hurts though

 

[Bounces R Way]

Got to find a way to get that puck deep. Ryan doesn't and then screens his own goalie. Simple mistakes really so far.

 

[Tofveve]

Crap sticks.

 

[joescores]

Typical us. Just keep leaking them f***ing goals.

 

[DFF]

f*** the refs trying to make up for the call on Keith

Pathetic

 

[DFF]

Knew that was coming, we were looking awful at the end of the period. Call missed on Neal hurts though

They thought the game was won

 

[204hockey]

Am I wrong thinking the hit on dube shld have only been 2 min ? I'm confused

 

[Ace Rimmer]

Am I wrong thinking the hit on dube shld have only been 2 min ? I'm confused

Why? Did the injury confuse you? Or was it the elbow to the boards while he was super vulnerable.

 

[FlamerForLife]

Horrible missed call on the Neal hooking results in a goal the other way, go figure. Reffing remains a joke in this league.

 

[Rubi]

Am I wrong thinking the hit on dube shld have only been 2 min ? I'm confused

41.1	Boarding - A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who checks an opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to be thrown violently in the boards. The severity of the penalty, based upon the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.
	There is an enormous amount of judgement involved in the application of this rule by the Referees. The onus is on the player (or goalkeeper) applying the check to ensure his opponent is not in a vulnerable position and if so, he must avoid the contact. However, there is also a responsibility on the player with the puck to avoid placing himself in a dangerous and vulnerable position. This balance must be considered by the Referees when applying this rule.
	Any unnecessary contact with a player playing the puck on an obvious "icing" or "off-side" play which results in that player being knocked into the boards is "boarding" and must be penalized as such. In other instances where there is no contact with the boards, it should be treated as "charging".
41.2	Minor Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a minor penalty, based on the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, to a player or goalkeeper guilty of boarding an opponent.
41.3	Major Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a major penalty, based on the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, to a player or goalkeeper guilty of boarding an opponent (see 42.5).
41.4	Match Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a match penalty if, in his judgement, the player or goalkeeper attempted to or deliberately injured his opponent by boarding.
41.5	Game Misconduct Penalty - When a major penalty is imposed under his rile for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent, a game misconduct shall be imposed.

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

 

[204hockey]

Why? Did the injury confuse you? Or was it the elbow to the boards while he was super vulnerable.

Kinda looked like it was just a bad situation I'm watching on phone so not best views but looks like it was on the side but just the angle dube was at made him hit the board I was thinking like 2 for boarding idk either way I want hawks to lose just tryna be UN biased lol

 

[204hockey]

41.1	Boarding - A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who checks an opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to be thrown violently in the boards. The severity of the penalty, based upon the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.
	There is an enormous amount of judgement involved in the application of this rule by the Referees. The onus is on the player (or goalkeeper) applying the check to ensure his opponent is not in a vulnerable position and if so, he must avoid the contact. However, there is also a responsibility on the player with the puck to avoid placing himself in a dangerous and vulnerable position. This balance must be considered by the Referees when applying this rule.
	Any unnecessary contact with a player playing the puck on an obvious "icing" or "off-side" play which results in that player being knocked into the boards is "boarding" and must be penalized as such. In other instances where there is no contact with the boards, it should be treated as "charging".
41.2	Minor Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a minor penalty, based on the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, to a player or goalkeeper guilty of boarding an opponent.
41.3	Major Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a major penalty, based on the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, to a player or goalkeeper guilty of boarding an opponent (see 42.5).
41.4	Match Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a match penalty if, in his judgement, the player or goalkeeper attempted to or deliberately injured his opponent by boarding.
41.5	Game Misconduct Penalty - When a major penalty is imposed under his rile for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent, a game misconduct shall be imposed.

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Wow refs have discretion on making these calls.. How did dube not get an embellishment call then to save the mighty black hawks ???

 

[DFF]

Wow refs have discretion on making these calls.. How did dube not get an embellishment call then to save the mighty black hawks ???

They already made it up with the 5 on 3 and the miss on Neal

NHL refs is a joke

 

[204hockey]

They already made it up with the 5 on 3 and the miss on Neal

NHL refs is a joke

Gotta get the hawks in the playoffs somehow!