Has hybrid icing turned into no-touch?

Discussion in 'National Hockey League Talk' started by pwisch, Dec 9, 2014.

  1. NyQuil

    NyQuil F.Y.R.O.U.S.

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    66,317
    Likes Received:
    11,960
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Ottawa, ON
  2. KirkOut

    KirkOut EveryoneOut

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2012
    Messages:
    14,436
    Likes Received:
    3,423
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Nuclear Engineer
    Location:
    USA
    I was playing in college when they made the switch from No-touch to hybrid. In the first game or 2 there was a lot of confusion at first among players, coaches, and even refs. But eventually we got used to it. I think I like No-touch better just because it both prevents injuries (the reason for NHL switching from what it used to be to hybrid) and leaves out the ambiguity of who reaches an imaginary line on the ice first. The lazy part of me certainly liked no-touch better :laugh:

    I wouldn't mind if NHL just went to no-touch. It eliminates a possible source of referee error and doesn't really take anything away from the game IMO
     
  3. Duodenum

    Duodenum Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    91
    Occupation:
    Entrepreneur
    Location:
    East Vancouver
    I love hybrid icing.

    Find it better than both touch and no-touch icing.

    It has the ability to both reduce injuries while allowing plays to breakdown neutral zone clogging (ie. shoot the puck down the ice with an onrushing forward to beat out an icing call).

    I, for one, wish they do not touch this rule ever again.
     
  4. TheStranger

    TheStranger Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    18,400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Several times a night players are arguing with the ref because they are a stride or more ahead at the hashmarks and its still blown dead.

    I'm thinking that, as was the danger with regular icing, any sort of race is going to result in injuries, so unless the player is miles ahead where no real race is happening, they basically give it to the defending team.
     
  5. IDuck

    IDuck Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,282
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    154
    i am so with you, i think it so stupid when a dman sends a stretch pass up to a forward, only to have it hit a bad piece of ice and be a "icing"....i think icing HAS to been in the game but they should try to minimize the call as its pretty obvious when a guy is "icing" the puck or when they miss on a pass
     
  6. TaLoN

    TaLoN All Hail the FBJ!

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    28,795
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Farmington, MN
    Hybrid icing is by far the best IMO.
     
  7. CpatainCanuck

    CpatainCanuck Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,611
    Likes Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Hybrid icing allows for some more creative uses of the ice surface. The Sedins have scored a few goals like this for example:

     
  8. SteelCitySenator

    SteelCitySenator Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    670
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    I grew up knowing no touch icing first(echl), and honestly it's not all that much different than hybrid. I think players are just slightly more aware not to dump the puck carelessly, as there is no race to win
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"