Leetch3
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2009
- 12,951
- 10,727
He has played wing in college but has been a center the rest of his life, so it would depend on need for us where he lands.
his being a center in midget hockey doesn't have much relevance
He has played wing in college but has been a center the rest of his life, so it would depend on need for us where he lands.
his being a center in midget hockey doesn't have much relevance
Question for our prospect experts-does Kravstov play on the left wing for Hartford or the right?
And how about Barron. I know he's played center but I've also heard he may end up on the wing. Would it be right or left and is that the most likely scenario?
I think Barron staying at LW for the time being is perfectly fine. We're lacking quality LW in the system anyways.
I agree, but LW seems the weakest at the moment. At least at C and RW, we have some extremely highly skilled players in Henriksson and Kravtsovwe are lacking quality depth in the system at all forward positions...
We also have our top 6 lw's locked up for the next 6 years already. Seems ok to be light on lw prospects with panarin and kreider already here.I agree, but LW seems the weakest at the moment. At least at C and RW, we have some extremely highly skilled players in Henriksson and Kravtsov
True, but we'll still need depth throughout our farm if we want to be a sustainable contender throughout this decade. The only way to do that is have high turnover with players on ELCs, and beyond Barron, I'm not really seeing anyone outside of Gettinger that seems like a viable NHL option.We also have our top 6 lw's locked up for the next 6 years already. Seems ok to be light on lw prospects with panarin and kreider already here.
I would think that Pajuniemi comes over this year. Barron for sure. Kravtsov. Henriksson (further ahead though). Maybe we get another young North<->South guy in a one for one Lias swap this offseason? A couple unsigned college guys likely incoming as per usual. Sign that Nick Jones guy to an NHL deal for future bottom 6 presence perhaps? Any undetected "diamond in the rough" unsigned Canadian Jr guysout there? Enigmatic, yet undiscovered, (soft) Europeans (it is time for a new Zuccarello find - sans the Webster element)? Then what? So - yeah (you are so right) - we really need more depth up front in the organisation. Maybe this is given priority and specifically adressed this offseason, i.e. at the draft and beyond?True, but we'll still need depth throughout our farm if we want to be a sustainable contender throughout this decade. The only way to do that is have high turnover with players on ELCs, and beyond Barron, I'm not really seeing anyone outside of Gettinger that seems like a viable NHL option.
If Belesky or Lettieri get called up cus of Kreider's injury... it would be a kiss of death for the Pack, especially if it Vinni.
I'd goIf they recall somebody, I would order my hopes as:
1. Gettinger
2. Lettieri
3. Fogarty
I'm done with Nieves, and Gettinger never seemed to get the opporunity that Fogarty did in their recent call ups.
I'd go
Gettinger
Fogarty
Lettieri
The first two can play an effective bottom six game (I actually think Getts has a chance to be a fulltime guy in the league) and Lettieri just does nothing for an NHL squad. Meanwhile, his subtraction from the Wolfpack would be debilitating for them.
I don't understand why Gettinger never seems to get a chance when IMO he's looked the most NHL of all of the squad
especially over garbage like Nieves