Two things:
-Lawless made a good point last night (which shocked me, even though it is common knowledge around here), but didn't make the obvious follow through. Even though Buff is the better player, 60 games of Buff is not more valuable than ~300 games of Hamonic; which is why Snow would say "no". He didn't make the obvious extension which is that ~300 games of Hamonic is not worth the 600-700 (or more) games that Trouba could play for the Jets; which is why Chevy would say no. Neither of those trades is worth consideration without a fairly significant add from one team.
-I mentioned this in part 1 of this thread, but I think it is very underrated element of a potential trade. The obvious pieces are Myers and Hamonic; similar age, similar overall contribution (Harmonic is better, but not as much as some feel) and both on team-friendly deals. However, they are team-freindly for very different reasons. Hamonic's is preferable for a contending cap team as his cap hit is lower than his actual salary. Myers is preferable for a team concerned about the actual dollars going out the door but has no intention of spending to the cap as his salary is less than his cap hit. In other words, both have ideal contracts for the teams they currently play for. I think this is a bigger impediment than people realize.
While I'm not sure Chevy really needs to make a trade here, if he does pull the trigger, it signals that he thinks his team may be a contender during the life of Hamonic's contract and TNSE will spend towards the cap; making the particular team-friendly feature of Hamonic's contract useful. I know they have said as much in the past, but there has been no evidence of this in terms of actual action. This would be, in my mind, the first indication that TNSE was not simply blowing hot air.