I’ll ignore the arrogant sarcasm, and simply say we can always draft a 1C and sign a 2C if Studnicka Or Beecher aren’t up to the task
I find it a bit silly that some goofy reach names are thrown out as potential Weber replacements but nobody in the Bruins system has a chance to replace the Bruins Veterans
teams don’t need to hit rock bottom to find viable replacements in important spots
if you think going full rebuild is the only way to be competitive then I guess that’s simply your opinion and won’t try to change it
There was no sarcasm, not sure how saying Bruins are contending could be considered as such.
I don't see a 1C in the Bruins system, very few exist. A full rebuild likely wouldn't be needed for sure, you have the 1D and the game breaker (Pasta). It's definitely a lot to ask for anyone in the Bruins system to replace what your current 1C brings and has brought.
Difference between saying that one of the Habs names could replace Weber and one of the Bruins names could replace Bergeron is quantity and pedigree. Also, rarity. Also, immediacy (Weber isn't the Habs 5-on-5 1D, Petry is).
Pretty much what I said is the Habs had to be intentional to get Suzuki and Kotkaneimi, they didn't fall into their laps through luck. When Bruins need to replace who they got, they'll no doubt have to do that too and that's a problem that doesn't really need to be worried about while they are cup chasing eh