Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
That's it Marc, Vacation time now!!!!
He can shoot the puck, which 70% of our D can’t do. So I like it.
All of our D can shoot the puck. The problem is, they can't get the puck through and on net.
Jerabek, v.2 ?
Better ceiling imo
Anyone seen this kid play ? Habs Eye on the Prize article offers pretty good insight on what type of player he is but it's hard to find any highlights.
Highlight reel:
Undrafted Dman who has developed well enough to earn a pro contract. Who knows how well he will play in NA.
Nothing burger for now
Does Mete really can ?
Anyone seen this kid play ? Habs Eye on the Prize article offers pretty good insight on what type of player he is but it's hard to find any highlights.
Jerabek, v.2 ?
Leskinen ça veut dire Loup de fer en suédois
I hope he pans outGotta have some fishing lines in the water, if we're going to get any bites. It's not earth-shattering but it's part of what all orgs do. Let's see what Bouchard can do with him.
I saw him last year and at the development camp but I'm drawing a blank on him.
They don't compare at all since Leskinen broke out in Liiga at 21 as he put up more points this year in 57 games then he did in his career in 121 games (mostly 19/20). Jerabek at 21 had only 8 pts in a weaker league and didn't break out till he was 23 and still in a weaker league. He didn't come over till he was 26, that said we have had terrible luck with our undrafted Euro picks, I like Sklenicka as maybe in a few years he gets a cup of coffee in the NHL and Jerabek does have 8 pts in 37 NHL games so if Leskinen can progress over the next few years then we might have something.
Seems like a offensive D type but needs to learn how to be reliable in his own end. More than 2/3 of Kalpa's team were (-) players last season and Leskinen -17 was 3rd worse with another D man worse than him at -23.
Another Fleury type but on the LD side maybe? Interesting to note that Fleury was a -61 with Kootenay in 16/17 but once he was traded to to Regina, he was a +23 in 51 games. His first AHL year he was -16 which is tied for worse on the Rockets.
Lol.....
Ikonen, Ylonen, Leskinen, Lehkonen, Armia, Kotkaniemi.......my money is on us drafting another Finn
Romanov the lone Russian lol
... Mean jack**** to be honest... +/- is a team/situational stat mostly... Should be compared to the rest of the team also considering time on ice, pp and pk usage... You can be -61 and STILL be the best defensive player on your team, context is important when looking at that particular stat... I get your point but it's irrelevant honestly imo... Unless it looks particularly bad compared to his teammates of course but still not a "real"/personnal stat per sayDo you have anything constructive to say? If not, move on. It's an observation on two type of players who produce offensively as D man but were ranked near the bottom on their teams in +/-.