granted, but we can't have a team with all line composed of small players.
Domi-5"9
Drouin-5"10
Gallagher-5"9
Byron-5"9
Tatar-5"10
Weal-5"10
Shaw-5"11
Mete-5"9 but defense
Hudon-5"10
Peca-5"9
Not just height, but weight. Also, outside of Domi, Gallagher and Shaw, there is a lack of sandpaper.
There needs to be a better asset mix.
Poehling, Thompson, Weal, Lehkonen, Tatar, and Danault have a little sand paper in their game.
...
Poehling probably, but haven't seen enough to know. The others are not at the same level of Domi, Shaw and Gallagher. And even these three are limited by their size. We could uselast two additions that are big physical players who can skate.
Yes I agree. My strategy would be to sign a UFA that's at least as good as Byron and bigger, and then trade Byron for a 2nd. I like Byron. But we have to get bigger. Ideally I'd also do the same with Drouin. But Drouin's value is so low right now I don't see us getting enough in return.
But I'm not GM. Bergevin is. So we'll see what he does. I'm hoping he can get at least 1 UFA top 9, if not a second one and/or a LD like Gardiner.
Trading Byron for a 2nd is a poor return. If we wanted to trade him, I'd want at least a first or we might as well keep him.
So what do you do if we sign a winger like Anders Lee or Panarin - or someone else better than Byron?
I'd rather trade Shaw, Armia, or get rid of 4th liners like Peca, Weise, or Deslauriers. Byron can play on any line, is great on the PK, and has a very reasonable salary.
Injuries happen during the season, I'd rather have Byron there to be moved up the lineup than some of the poor options we had this year.
It's not should of, it's should have.
Yes I agree. My strategy would be to sign a UFA that's at least as good as Byron and bigger, and then trade Byron for a 2nd. I like Byron. But we have to get bigger. Ideally I'd also do the same with Drouin. But Drouin's value is so low right now I don't see us getting enough in return.
But I'm not GM. Bergevin is. So we'll see what he does. I'm hoping he can get at least 1 UFA top 9, if not a second one and/or a LD like Gardiner.
Gardiner is getting shitted on in Toronto for 2 years straight , if you think he will leave this shithole to join another one in Montreal. He will do a Kessel but this time he will choice his location.Agreed except for the part about Gardiner — I hope the GM finds better.
Won't be much of a fight imo Poehling will almost assuredly be playing game 1 next year and I doubt he goes downKK
Danault
Drouin
Domi
Lehkonen
Byron
Tatar
Gallagher
Shaw
Armia
Weal
11 foward with a sure spot
Poehling
Thompson
Deslauriers
Should fight for the 2 spots remaining and the rest with Laval
Byron for a 2nd is terrible asset management. He's been a consistent 20 goal scorer the last 3 seasons, doesn't need much ice time, powerplay or great linemates to score and plays good defense. Overall, he's been more effective than some higher paid members of the team and yet we haven't heard a peep from him complaining. The probability that you're gonna get a player of his caliber in the second round of the draft is minuscule. If he's moved, it should be as part of a bigger deal for a better player.
If you think that lil body is getting "more" durable as he approaches 30, you're in for a surprise
i love the guy, but that extension made no sense
Can you actually prove that bigger players get injured less often than smaller players?
Bigger stronger human beings hurting smaller less strong human beings...?
Does common sense about cover it for you or do you really need science and statistics..?
Yeah well, usually bigger means less mobile, less agile, less shifty, they can probably hit harder due to their mass but I don't think there's such a huge correlation though...
Was Plekanec big and stuff ? The guy missed like 6 games in his entire career!
"Yeah well, thats just like, my opinion, ..man" right?
If you cant see that Byron's injuries this season are DIRECTLY correlated to "bigger means they can probably hit harder due to their mass but I don't think there's such a huge correlation though..."
Then I dont know what to tell you lol.......
Dustin Byfuglien is massive...he hasn't been able to stay healthy the last 2yrsBigger stronger human beings hurting smaller less strong human beings...?
Does common sense about cover it for you or do you really need science and statistics..?
"Yeah well, thats just like, my opinion, ..man" right?
If you cant see that Byron's injuries this season are DIRECTLY correlated to "bigger means they can probably hit harder due to their mass but I don't think there's such a huge correlation though..."
Then I dont know what to tell you lol.......
Dustin Byfuglien is massive...he hasn't been able to stay healthy the last 2yrs
Ben Bishop is one of the NHL's biggest goalies if not the biggest, he's been injury prone his entire career.
When smaller players get hurt, people always point to their size as the cause.
When bigger players get hurt, no one says it's because of their size.
These are just narratives, injuries are for the most part random occurrences that can happen to anyone, of any size at any time.
Bro, with your logic bigger players, would never get injured but they actually do because **** happens!