Need to remember that Bergevin and Yzerman are the best of friends, So the odds of Bergevin even throwing an OS to Detroit is slim to none. Montreal would need to offer sheet Mantha in the $8.5m range for Yzerman to take the picks so that 2 1st a 2nd and 3rd anything less and Yzerman easily matches probably have to be around $9m to $9.5m over 5 seasons for Yzerman to take the picks. So yeah for $8.3m Yzerman would match that rather easily.
Detroit would never accept that deal for Mantha, If MB wants Mantha it's going to be brutally painful for him. Yzerman isn't Holland he's in the drivers seat on Mantha and anything less then a major overpayment isn't happening.Would you trade domi , a 2nd and a 3rd for Mantha ?
Sure, it's very possible Bergevin does not go that high. I realize that. Don't you realize this is fantasy talk by fans and 99% of the stuff we talk about don't happen?
You are questioning the logic?
* Habs went 3 seasons now with $5M+ in cap space. Some are thinking $9M for Mantha is a horrible idea. $2M - $3M overpaid when we had $5M+ in wasted cap space for 3 years now.
* Habs have Suzuki, KK, Romanov, Caufield, Norlinder, Primeau on ELC/bridge deals in the next 3-5 years.
* Habs can let go Byron and Tatar if we are forced to.
* Alzner is off the books in 2 years
* Weber likely retires in 3 years when he salary drops to $1M for his age 38 season
* Mantha has Laine numbers in the last 2 years. I think he fits the Habs very well and I'm willing to gamble a bit
Habs don't have cap problems. I would not have any problems overpaying Mantha by $2M - $3M when we need a winger like this and we have the cap space to pull it off. Now is the right time for the Habs to get aggressive. You don't have to agree but I gave you lots of context to support the logic.
With Marner, you're overpaying a guy who scored 94+ points and who you expect to consistently be a 90+ point winger going forward (he paced for it again this year).
With Matthews - you're overpaying a top 5 asset in the league, a player expected to be a top 5 player in the league in his prime, or close. A potential perennial rocket winner, or at least ~45-50 goal guy.
I agree ideally - Leafs should have negotiated better deals based on their RFA status and not paid as much. But i'd be less upset about overpaying an absolute top player than a non-top player. 9.5M$ for Mantha is just.....insane
Give it a couple more years and Dubas will be run out of town . They will have to unload Matthews before the final year of his deal because he will have a full no movement clause . The leafs will get nowhere near his value because no team will pay for it knowing he will be testing free agency . Now that was insane . Marner on the other hand is beautiful to watch . Just not in the playoffs when the ref puts the whistle away . Kinda like Johnny hockey. Now giving 22 million to guys who haven’t won you a playoff series is insane . Chicago yes . Toews and Kane delivered three cups .With Marner, you're overpaying a guy who scored 94+ points and who you expect to consistently be a 90+ point winger going forward (he paced for it again this year).
With Matthews - you're overpaying a top 5 asset in the league, a player expected to be a top 5 player in the league in his prime, or close. A potential perennial rocket winner, or at least ~45-50 goal guy.
I agree ideally - Leafs should have negotiated better deals based on their RFA status and not paid as much. But i'd be less upset about overpaying an absolute top player than a non-top player. 9.5M$ for Mantha is just.....insane
$9.5M is overpaid by $2M - $3M range yes. What is your sane AAV? $6.5M? And you don't think Mantha produces more in his prime years? Risky yes but I think you are overly conservative. You rather waste more years with $5M in cap space and overpay Gallagher and Tatar after their prime years right?
Your strategy is more middle of the pack years cause you think Hall signs with the Habs
Mantha is a beast and IMO a great fit in Montreal. However, the OP's plan doesn't consider the long term players the Habs need to get under contract in the next few years and their internal cap structure.
The best-case scenario would be to get Mantha an offer sheet around 8M that walks him to free agency. I would guess that 8M is more than Yzerman probably wants to pay and even if he does after his deal ends Montreal can take another shot at him then. Just to be clear though, I don't think this is a good idea.
Who freaking cares if Yzerman plays hard ball with Mantha or not, Even Mantha acknowledges with his injury history that he might not command the money he'd like if he stayed healthy and put up better numbers. Yzerman can offer him 7 x 7 or 7 x 7.5 with the hope that he stays healthy and at least puts up between 60-70 points per season more would be an added bonus. If Yzerman feels that Mantha might not be part of our core going forward he can offer him 3 years $21 million eating 1 year of UFA. Yzerman isn't going to overspend on Mantha in a flat cap world and neither should Marc Bergevin Yzerman just said that he's not going to spend wildly like he did in Tampa. He's going to be very conservative in his signings from here on out.This is about if Yzerman plays hard ball with Mantha and tries to low ball him. Then Mantha's agent calls Bergevin to reveal the low offer the Wings have on the table. If this narrative does not happen, forget about it.
As far as $8.3M, that is the threshold where it's one less 1st (Actually, it's $8.726M). You still don't match with one less 1st?
I don't have any problems with overpaying Mantha which is the exact type of piece we need on wing. Habs have lots of flexibility with our cap management moving forward.
Mantha could be the PPG player he looked to be this year, and he's still not worth being in the top 5 highest paid wingers in the league.
At best, if he hadn't gotten hurt and Corona didn't hit and he got a full season this year, he was only looking at $8M from Detroit.
Who freaking cares if Yzerman plays hard ball with Mantha or not, Even Mantha acknowledges with his injury history that he might not command the money he'd like if he stayed healthy and put up better numbers. Yzerman can offer him 7 x 7 or 7 x 7.5 with the hope that he stays healthy and at least puts up between 60-70 points per season more would be an added bonus. If Yzerman feels that Mantha might not be part of our core going forward he can offer him 3 years $21 million eating 1 year of UFA. Yzerman isn't going to overspend on Mantha in a flat cap world and neither should Marc Bergevin Yzerman just said that he's not going to spend wildly like he did in Tampa. He's going to be very conservative in his signings from here on out.
This is comical...
Yes but he may not want to pay Mantha 8.5 million for 7 years . He will only receive a first second and third . He may be more inclined to talk trade than . If we recover a first next year from someone for domi it would essentially be domi and a second and third . If yzerman continues to ask for to much than he can enjoy paying Mantha the 8.5Detroit would never accept that deal for Mantha, If MB wants Mantha it's going to be brutally painful for him. Yzerman isn't Holland he's in the drivers seat on Mantha and anything less then a major overpayment isn't happening.
$9.5M is overpaid by $2M - $3M range yes. What is your sane AAV? $6.5M? And you don't think Mantha produces more in his prime years? Risky yes but I think you are overly conservative. You rather waste more years with $5M in cap space and overpay Gallagher and Tatar after their prime years right?
Your strategy is more middle of the pack years cause you think Hall signs with the Habs
I hope he gets to conservativeWho freaking cares if Yzerman plays hard ball with Mantha or not, Even Mantha acknowledges with his injury history that he might not command the money he'd like if he stayed healthy and put up better numbers. Yzerman can offer him 7 x 7 or 7 x 7.5 with the hope that he stays healthy and at least puts up between 60-70 points per season more would be an added bonus. If Yzerman feels that Mantha might not be part of our core going forward he can offer him 3 years $21 million eating 1 year of UFA. Yzerman isn't going to overspend on Mantha in a flat cap world and neither should Marc Bergevin Yzerman just said that he's not going to spend wildly like he did in Tampa. He's going to be very conservative in his signings from here on out.
Sure, it's very possible Bergevin does not go that high. I realize that. Don't you realize this is fantasy talk by fans and 99% of the stuff we talk about don't happen?
You are questioning the logic?
* Habs went 3 seasons now with $5M+ in cap space. Some are thinking $9M for Mantha is a horrible idea. $2M - $3M overpaid when we had $5M+ in wasted cap space for 3 years now.
* Habs have Suzuki, KK, Romanov, Caufield, Norlinder, Primeau on ELC/bridge deals in the next 3-5 years.
* Habs can let go Byron and Tatar if we are forced to.
* Alzner is off the books in 2 years
* Weber likely retires in 3 years when he salary drops to $1M for his age 38 season
* Mantha has Laine numbers in the last 2 years. I think he fits the Habs very well and I'm willing to gamble a bit
Habs don't have cap problems. I would not have any problems overpaying Mantha by $2M - $3M when we need a winger like this and we have the cap space to pull it off. Now is the right time for the Habs to get aggressive. You don't have to agree but I gave you lots of context to support the logic.
I understand your logic, I just question it’s right. If you sign Mantha to 9-9.5 million per year, how does that effect the negotiations with all your RFA’s and UFA’s over the next 2-3 years? You think Danault will happily sign for 5.5 million when he just watched his team sign an player from a different team who he likely sees himself as a comparable value wise? Signing Mantha to 9-9.5 million blows your entire cap structure internally out of the water.
Mantha isn't getting 8.5 even Yzerman isn't that dumb. Mantha has 2 48 point seasons under his belt possibly a 3rd this year if COVID hadn't ended the season. If Yzerman offered Mantha 8 years $60 million or a $7.5m AAV he'd easily take that deal. Flat cap for possibly 3 more seasons is going to hurt tons of teams.Yes but he may not want to pay Mantha 8.5 million for 7 years . He will only receive a first second and third . He may be more inclined to talk trade than . If we recover a first next year from someone for domi it would essentially be domi and a second and third . If yzerman continues to ask for to much than he can enjoy paying Mantha the 8.5
How even 8.5m x 5 years for someone like Mantha is no biggie in a flat cap world when you will have RFAs looking for their own deals is the mystery to me. Some people are predicting the cap won’t go up for years even with the boost from Seattle after the financial losses of this season. I know, I know you have a secret plan you can’t let the other GMs know about...
Habs would be better off making that offer to Barzal...