Please stop.. you're just embrassing yourself..
If coaching is such nonfactor, how come Finland finished 7th in 12-13 (U-20)
But in 16-17 we had sort of a good team but were dead last in Group A. Why didnt you use that one against me instead? Me thinks Rautakorpi should have been used against me in this situation. Bad tournament coaches get exposed but the line between mediocre and good is not really noticeable due to short tournament lenghts. Also, the North American rink has been our biggest obstacle on the WJC stage. Some of the worst results are from those.
I guess I should have specified that I don't think that coaching is the most essential thing to look at on a WJC winning team since those games are dominated on individual skill more than adult games.
But there should be no argument against the WJC and WHC being completely different stages.
I don't think Jalonen did nearly as much as one would think on that tournament, he was essentially carried by Pula-Aho.
That's not a slight on him. WJC is totally different and the most important thing seems to be generating offense and he got that in spades. He didn't really employ a defensively sound system outside the leading 2 lines (and those broke down at times as well) but junior teams mostly play all-offense games anyways. So no harm done.
He has done well with his defensive system in the WHC though.
Of course you can't say he's bad or something along the lines of that because of that but I don't think it should be a merit of his. Sure, it's a positive for him and gives confidence towards his upcoming job but it shouldnt be used as an argument for him bringing us a gold medal. Use his earlier WHC win for that argument and we're more along the same lines.
He's not a god. He has won 1 bronze and gold in WHC, 1 Olympic bronze and the aforementioned WJC gold in a 8 year window. I think he's overrated to some extent, but that's due to happen because Marjamäki has been on one bad (if not the worst) stretch of coaching.