Gretzky/McDavid/Messier/??? Versus Lemieux/Crosby/Malkin/Francis

Which centre group would you rather have?


  • Total voters
    287

Incognito

Registered User
Oct 18, 2008
6,443
2,985
Toronto, Ontario
I take the Pens group based on depth. There's not a huge amount of separation between Gretzky - Lemieux, McDavid - Crosby, and Messier - Malkin, but Francis is much, much better than any 4th centre that the Oilers could nominate.
 

dr robbie

Let's Go Pens!
Feb 21, 2012
3,143
1,113
Pittsburgh
Gretzky's obviously the best of the bunch, but I don't think the difference between Gretz - Lemieux is greater than the difference between Francis - whoever you choose from the Oilers. I'll take the Pens 4 over the Oiler's 3 1/2
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,154
14,714
I take the Pens group based on depth. There's not a huge amount of separation between Gretzky - Lemieux, McDavid - Crosby, and Messier - Malkin, but Francis is much, much better than any 4th centre that the Oilers could nominate.

No offense but that's literally the worst argument you could have said.

Gretzky (best ever)
Lemieux (best ever if u dont think it's 99)
Crosby (so good...could have been close to best ever, who knows with his peak interrupted)
McDavid (we haven't seen his peak yet, who knows how good he'll be)
Messier (diff mold than top 4, but wow what a player/leader....warrior)
Malkin (talent-wise he's up there with the best ever)


And you make your choice based on Francis? lol.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,154
14,714
Voted Pitt. super close. It's mostly based on the fact that i'd love to see those guys together at their best - i feel as though we've already seen Gretz at his best, so it's less exciting
 

Felidae

Registered User
Sep 30, 2016
9,643
11,153
No offense but that's literally the worst argument you could have said.

Gretzky (best ever)
Lemieux (best ever if u dont think it's 99)
Crosby (so good...could have been close to best ever, who knows with his peak interrupted)
McDavid (we haven't seen his peak yet, who knows how good he'll be)
Messier (diff mold than top 4, but wow what a player/leader....warrior)
Malkin (talent-wise he's up there with the best ever)


And you make your choice based on Francis? lol.

I don't see anything wrong with that argument. At least depending on the criteria. If we're taking the center groups based on peaks and what they've accomplished in close to a full season, that'd be the best argument imo. Even then, it's not too bad. Not as much separating those elite players compared to an elite player in Francis and someone who's yet to reach elite status, or never did.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,154
14,714
I don't see anything wrong with that argument. At least depending on the criteria. If we're taking the center groups based on peaks and what they've accomplished in close to a full season, that'd be the best argument imo. Even then, it's not too bad. Not as much separating those elite players compared to an elite player in Francis and someone who's yet to reach elite status, or never did.

What I mean is there's so much to be excited about regarding the other players. Who cares about Francis?

Gretzky/Lemieux
even Crosby/Malkin....certainly McDavid and what's to come, or Messier and his legendary status.

The question is which would you rather have. Pick the group that excites you the most. The group that you're more a fan of, the group you think will mesh better, the group you think will break more records....don't make the decision based on a 4th line center.

It'd be like me making a poll asking if you rather pick McDavid/Drai or Eichel/Dahlin - and you picking one or the other because of who the 4th line winger on a team is. I just don't get that line of thinking
 
  • Like
Reactions: Felidae

edog37

Registered User
Jan 21, 2007
6,070
1,620
Pittsburgh
Lemieux.....GOAT makes this an easy choice. Francis & Messier are equal. Crosby blows McOverrated out of the water & Geno has no equivalent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goku

Craig Button

The C is for Coward - Brad Marchand 2024
Jul 28, 2015
3,241
2,817
Leaf Nation Torontonistan
Lemieux > Gretzky
Crosby > McDavid
Messier > Malkin
Francis > ????

Easy to go with the Pens here on paper.
However Gretzky and Messier are proven winners,
Especially Messier.
Lemieux needed Francis.
Messier didn’t need Gretzky.

Too bad I can’t change my vote
 
Last edited:

La Masse

Registered User
May 5, 2016
5,576
1,986
Gatineau,Quebec
Wayne


Lemieux
Sid
Mcdavid
Malkin

Francis
Who cares.

Ill take the team with a prime 99 over anybody. He can turn a 4th liner into a decent player
 
  • Like
Reactions: newfy

edog37

Registered User
Jan 21, 2007
6,070
1,620
Pittsburgh
Lemieux > Gretzky
Crosby > McDavid
Messier > Malkin
Francis > ????

Easy to go with the Pens here on paper.
However Gretzky and Messier are proven winners,
Especially Messier.
Lemieux needed Francis.
Messier didn’t need Gretzky.

Too bad I can’t change my vote

Francis was a proven winner also. He wasn’t called Ronnie Franchise for nothing. When Lemieux got cheap shorted by Graves in ‘92, it was Francis who led the team.
 

Nadal On Clay

Djokovic > Nadal > Federer
Oct 11, 2017
3,067
2,687
I really think people are overrating the difference between Lemieux and Gretzky, they are a lost closer than people tend to believe. If it’s everyone at their peak form, it’s Pittsburgh, but it may switch to Edmonton when we’ll know what Peak McDavid is.

Very close.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Craig Button

The C is for Coward - Brad Marchand 2024
Jul 28, 2015
3,241
2,817
Leaf Nation Torontonistan
Francis was a proven winner also. He wasn’t called Ronnie Franchise for nothing. When Lemieux got cheap shorted by Graves in ‘92, it was Francis who led the team.

Exactly why I said Lemieux needed Francis.

I did vote for the Pens.
But the greatness of Gretzky and Messier make it a tough choice.
 

blogofmike

Registered User
Dec 16, 2010
2,178
927
I really think people are overrating the difference between Lemieux and Gretzky, they are a lost closer than people tend to believe. If Iran everyone at their peak form, it’s Pittsburgh, but it may switch to Edmonton when well know what Peak McDavid is.

Very close.

I don't visit this section often. So I never posted this here:

Lemieux Gretzky
DateResultGAPTS+/-GAPTS+/-
06-Nov-84Oilers 3 @ Pens 3 1111 1-1
12-Jan-85Oilers 3 @ Pens 42 2Even 33Even
26-Jan-85Pens 3 @ Oilers 61 1-13142
22-Jan-86Pens 7 @ Oilers 4 44Even112-2
07-Mar-86Pens 3 @ Oilers 5 11-1 222
26-Mar-86Oilers 8 @ Pens 3 11-21343
05-Dec-86Oilers 4 @ Pens 2 0-2 332
24-Jan-87Pens 2 @ Oilers 4 11Even1343
24-Feb-87Oilers 2 @ Pens 5 0Even 11-2
20-Nov-87Pens 1 @ Oilers 4 11-2 221
19-Feb-88Pens 3 @ Oilers 7 11Even 0Even
12-Nov-88Pens 2 @ Kings 7112-3 11Even
07-Mar-89Pens 2 @ Kings 3 (OT)1122 22Even
31-Oct-89Kings 8 @ Pens 4 22-33364
10-Feb-90Kings 6 @ Pens 7 11-1 11Even
26-Feb-91Pens 2 @ Kings 8 11-3 331
07-Mar-91Kings 2 @ Pens 3 2221121
07-Mar-92Pens 3 @ Kings 5 11-21233
11-Mar-93Kings 3 @ Pens 41342112Even
06-Nov-93Pens 3 @ Kings 8 22-2 443
26-Mar-96Blues 4 @ Pens 85273 11-2
16-Oct-96Pens 1 @ NYR 8 0-2 222
16-Nov-96NYR 8 @ Pens 3 11-1112Even
25-Jan-97NYR 7 @ Pens 4 0-2 331
24-Mar-97Pens 0 @ NYR 3 0-11122
Total (25 games)112738-1815415623
Oilers-era (11 games)31013-7715228
Post-Oilers (14 games)81725-118263415
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

Nadal On Clay

Djokovic > Nadal > Federer
Oct 11, 2017
3,067
2,687
I don't visit this section often. So I never posted this here:

LemieuxGretzky
DateResultGAPTS+/-GAPTS+/-
06-Nov-84Oilers 3 @ Pens 311111-1
12-Jan-85Oilers 3 @ Pens 422Even33Even
26-Jan-85Pens 3 @ Oilers 611-13142
22-Jan-86Pens 7 @ Oilers 444Even112-2
07-Mar-86Pens 3 @ Oilers 511-1222
26-Mar-86Oilers 8 @ Pens 311-21343
05-Dec-86Oilers 4 @ Pens 20-2332
24-Jan-87Pens 2 @ Oilers 411Even1343
24-Feb-87Oilers 2 @ Pens 50Even11-2
20-Nov-87Pens 1 @ Oilers 411-2221
19-Feb-88Pens 3 @ Oilers 711Even0Even
12-Nov-88Pens 2 @ Kings 7112-311Even
07-Mar-89Pens 2 @ Kings 3 (OT)112222Even
31-Oct-89Kings 8 @ Pens 422-33364
10-Feb-90Kings 6 @ Pens 711-111Even
26-Feb-91Pens 2 @ Kings 811-3331
07-Mar-91Kings 2 @ Pens 32221121
07-Mar-92Pens 3 @ Kings 511-21233
11-Mar-93Kings 3 @ Pens 41342112Even
06-Nov-93Pens 3 @ Kings 822-2443
26-Mar-96Blues 4 @ Pens 8527311-2
16-Oct-96Pens 1 @ NYR 80-2222
16-Nov-96NYR 8 @ Pens 311-1112Even
25-Jan-97NYR 7 @ Pens 40-2331
24-Mar-97Pens 0 @ NYR 30-11122
Total (25 games)112738-1815415623
Oilers-era (11 games)31013-7715228
Post-Oilers (14 games)81725-118263415
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Thanks for reminding us that the Oilers dynasty was a better team than the 80s Lemieux Pens!
 

Sensinitis

Registered User
Aug 5, 2012
15,934
5,526
Without a doubt one of the dumbest posts I've read here in months.

I wouldn’t dare speaking if I were you, considering you just posted that “gretzky is so much better than anyone else on this list”. Lemieux is on the list. The gap between Gretzky and Lemieux, whatever it may be, is not close to being as big as the words “so much better” suggest.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->