Gretzky, Lemieux, Coffey vs Makarov, Krutov, Fetisov 3x3 OT

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Kshahdoo, Oct 5, 2018.

  1. Kshahdoo

    Kshahdoo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,057
    Likes Received:
    919
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Who would have a better chance to win?
     
  2. The Panther

    The Panther Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    8,057
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    Whichever won the first face-off.
     
    shills, Iceman, MadLuke and 4 others like this.
  3. Claude Pepe Lemieux

    Claude Pepe Lemieux The greatest HFBoards pest of all time! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,045
    Trophy Points:
    99
    Gender:
    Male
    Gretzky, Lemieux and Coffey hands down.
     
    cipher, Vanzig, Mean Gene and 2 others like this.
  4. bobholly39

    bobholly39 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2013
    Messages:
    8,107
    Likes Received:
    1,759
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Lemieux and Gretzky are too good (and Coffey's speed helps) not to beat absolutely any combination you can come up with in OT.
     
  5. ForsbergForever

    ForsbergForever Red Rocket

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Who are the goalies?
     
    Puck Dogg, jj cale and Sentinel like this.
  6. JackSlater

    JackSlater Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    9,223
    Likes Received:
    1,427
    Trophy Points:
    109
    I'm very confident in the first group. The fewer players there are the less chemistry would matter. Tarasov even had a quote regarding a similar idea and Bobby Hull.
     
  7. Sentinel

    Sentinel Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Home Page:
    Whoever has the better goalie.

    Obviously the first group has greater offensive talent, but the second is better defensively and more physical.
     
  8. bobholly39

    bobholly39 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2013
    Messages:
    8,107
    Likes Received:
    1,759
    Trophy Points:
    126
    I don't think a goalie makes a big difference in a 3vs3 OT. At least not a good goalie.

    Like a Roy or Hasek? They wouldn't add much more value than any other regular starter. Maybe if a team has a particularly bad goalie it could be a crutch - but so long as both sides have at least average starters, in a 3vs3 OT i don't expect it plays a huge role. It's more about the skaters and the opportunities they create
     
    quoipourquoi likes this.
  9. VMBM

    VMBM Crawfish Fiesta

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,959
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Helsinki, FInland
    I wouldn't usually bet against Makarov, Krutov and Fetisov, but I guess in this case I would; in Gretzky you have the best playmaker of all-time and in Lemieux the best goal-scorer (and almost vice versa too). On the other hand, I think Makarov-Krutov-Fetisov have the edge defensively - they would do some serious scoring too.
     
  10. VanIslander

    VanIslander Don't waste my time

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    28,130
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Trophy Points:
    187
    Ridiculous.

    Two centers on one team vs. two wingers on the other.

    Oh, the lengths people go to to ignore the Professor.
     
    Iron Mike Sharpe likes this.
  11. VMBM

    VMBM Crawfish Fiesta

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,959
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Helsinki, FInland
    Well, Makarov and Krutov would definitely scare me more than Makarov and Larionov.

    And I'm not sure, but this thread might have been inspired by the 1987 Canada Cup, where Gretzky and Lemieux often played together (and did some serious damage of course) and where Makarov and Krutov were not far off in terms of impact (and Larionov stank).
     
    Sentinel likes this.
  12. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    57,961
    Likes Received:
    34,000
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    The Triangle
    If the Greztky-Lemieux side gains possession of the puck at all, it's very hard for me to imagine them failing to score. You're talking about two guys who are damn near impossible to strip of the puck, deadly in open space, both A++ level shooters and passers. Not sure how they can be defended in a 3x3 situation, other than just throwing yourself in front of the shot and hoping to deflect it.
     
  13. Nick Hansen

    Nick Hansen Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2017
    Messages:
    1,517
    Likes Received:
    868
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't see any one beating the Canadian trio but it'd be fun to see Orr - Howe - Lafleur.
     
    Thenameless likes this.
  14. Iron Mike Sharpe

    Iron Mike Sharpe Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2017
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    36
    The Canadians win the faceoff in this showdown, so it really can't go any other way.
     
  15. DannyGallivan

    DannyGallivan Your world frightens and confuses me

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Melonville
    Take Coffey off of the ice and it might be even.
     
    Tarantula likes this.
  16. DannyGallivan

    DannyGallivan Your world frightens and confuses me

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Melonville
    Sorry Gordie, but let's go all out speed... Lafleur, Bobby Hull, Bobby Orr.
     
    Thenameless likes this.
  17. Kshahdoo

    Kshahdoo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,057
    Likes Received:
    919
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Well, as far as, I remember, it was Krutov, who mostly did FOs on the KLM line...

    And as to puck possession, Makarov, Krutov and Fetisov were as good, as anybody else, there were so many cases, when they destroyed any opposition, Greztky, Lemieux and Coffey included. If they had the puck, it was so hard to strip them off it. And they could pass and score as well.
     
  18. Troubadour

    Troubadour Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2018
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    233
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Gender:
    Female
    Not 3 on 3 of course, but but but...



    (Krutov assists on this one too.)
     
    Sentinel likes this.
  19. Tarantula

    Tarantula Hanging around the web

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2017
    Messages:
    831
    Likes Received:
    441
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    GTA
    I think the first group had better score quickly because if the puck goes the other way I would not trust Coffey on a three on three defensively against the latter three.
     
  20. Sentinel

    Sentinel Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Home Page:
    :partytime:
     
    Nick Hansen likes this.
  21. Batis

    Batis Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    74
    Location:
    Merida, Mexico
    My money would probably be on the Canadian group since I find it very hard to bet against the Gretzky-Lemieux duo. Still this is one scenario where they probably would be in some trouble because of the Soviet group having an advantage on the defensive side of the game.

    While there is a major difference between playing shorthanded and playing 3-on-3 it is again worth noting that all of Makarov, Krutov and Fetisov throughout the 80's consistently excelled when killing penalties against the best that Canada could throw at them. In 10 games against Best-on-Best Team Canada and the NHL All-Stars between 1981 and 1987 Makarov averaged 2 minutes and 19 seconds of shorthanded ice time per game and was in on 3 goals forward and 5 goals against when for the most part going up against powerplay units such as Gretzky, Trottier, Bossy, Lafleur, Potvin or Gretzky, Lemieux, Messier, Bourque, Coffey. In those 10 games Krutov averaged 2 minutes and 26 seconds of shorthanded ice time per game and was in on 3 goals forward and 6 goals against.

    With these strong numbers in mind I feel very comfortable saying that the Soviet group would be able to give the Canadian group a run for their money 3-on-3 as well.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2018
    Sentinel and Thenameless like this.
  22. Thenameless

    Thenameless Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,368
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    94
    When Coffey is considered the weak link, and is bracketed by these two iconic pillars of offensive creativity, ability, finish, and "clutchness", I just cannot go the other way. This duo is what saved Canada in '87.

    Taking away two skaters from both sides would only amplify their "pond hockey" abilities.

    And all kudos to the Soviet/Russian trio. You wouldn't expect the other side to have an answer to the likes of 66 and 99, but they made an incredible series of it. My favourite hockey of all time along with Lafleur's 70's Habs.
     
    jj cale likes this.
  23. Ageless

    Ageless Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2013
    Messages:
    7,437
    Likes Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Two 200 point players on the same line in 3 on 3....
     
    shills and Vanzig like this.
  24. Sentinel

    Sentinel Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Home Page:
    Who is the second 200 point player?
     
  25. Troubadour

    Troubadour Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2018
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    233
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Gender:
    Female
    When it comes to an overtime, chemistry is a more important factor than ability to amass a huge pile of points over an 82-game run (although that ability points towards a lot of skill that may decide the overtime as well). Overtime is not about who scores more, it's about who scores first.

    The two-hundred point guys may not dare do the things they usually do, because they know once they lose the puck deep up front, Paul (who is probably up there with them) is not gonna stop the counter. It's an altogether different game.

    Lemieux is awesome one-on-one though, and that could prove to be a huge factor when so very few players are on the ice.
     
    Sentinel, Ageless and Dennis Bonvie like this.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"