NYRangers said:I'd like to think the Rangers are the head of the pack.
Blackburn (in hockey terms hes still a prospect) - Holt - Montoya - Lundqvist
NYRangers said:I'd like to think the Rangers are the head of the pack.
Blackburn (in hockey terms hes still a prospect) - Holt - Montoya - Lundqvist
Kubera55 said:I'd at least throw Labarberra in there somewhere. He's only 24, and he's dominant at the AHL level . . .
Blackburn is very questionable, Lundqvist is playing in the Euro leagues, Montoya is the only solid guy and I never heard of Holt???
DoobieDoobieDo said:Well you don't know how they are going to transit into the NHL. Until Lundqvist comes over and proves he can play in the AHL/NHL, I put him in good goaltender, unproven.
DoobieDoobieDo said:Personally I like Boston more...
Toivonen, Raycroft (though he did graduate), Sigalet, Brown, Regan...
Boston has a ridiculous amount of very solid goaltenders.
DoobieDoobieDo said:Lundqvist is playing in the Euro leagues.
I think you have to rely on the Ranger experts. Actions spoke londer than any words at the 2004 draft as to what they think of their goaltending.DoobieDoobieDo said:I like Montoya and Lundqvist but I don't think Rangers head the pack. I think there are other teams with better goaltenders out there and better depth.
NYIsles1 said:I think you have to rely on the Ranger experts. Actions spoke londer than any words at the 2004 draft as to what they think of their goaltending.
Those actions indicate they have little faith in the long-term prospect of Blackburn, Holmqvist or LaBarbera helping them or they never use another top overall pick on a second top-ten goaltender.....
Blackburn's draft was considered the deepest in a decade.
What's interesting to me is Schwartz went much later and was considered ahead of Montoya in a respectable number of pre-draft analysis.
This just seems like a bad gamble for an organization that did not have a single top ten pick in it's system (Jessiman was not a top-ten selection) and needed a forward or defender before selecting another goaltender...
NYRangers said:BPA - Best Player Avaliable. Most teams implement this. This is not the NFL draft. Your not drafting for next season, your drafting for years away. Whats wrong with having 3 top goalie prospects COMPETING for the starting job? That competition will make them all better and push them to the max.
Holmqvist? He was dealt like 2 years ago.
John Flyers Fan said:With all other positions I think the BPA is usually the best strategy, but NOT with goaltenders. Not that high in the draft.
You need 6 defenseman, and 12 forwards, but you ONLY need 1 goalie.
Exactly.John Flyers Fan said:With all other positions I think the BPA is usually the best strategy, but NOT with goaltenders. Not that high in the draft.
You need 6 defenseman, and 12 forwards, but you ONLY need 1 goalie.
NYRangers said:Why does everyone stock up on pitching in baseball? You only need 5? Its the most important position.