- Jan 22, 2007
- 14,475
- 7,317
You get it, Stephen.There'd be a lot more good will and patience around this group and some specific players if they didn't comport themselves the way they did during contract negotiations.
Tavares set the bar.
Nylander held out, the whole team paid the price, and it was pretty much a wasted year.
Marner went down the same path as Nylander but the Leafs didn't want to call his bluff and caved.
Matthews--they knew this kid wasn't going to leave a penny on the table after seeing what the team gave Tavares--so they handed him a blank check and said, "write in what you want."
NONE of these players took legit less to help the organization. None of them sacrificed a little coin so the team could spend on quality depth. Instead, they all looked arrogant, selfish and greedy handling their business. Does the media's obsession with this fuel the fire? Of course. But the players did nothing to help.
The long, drawn out "Tavares Sweepstakes" to the "Nylander holout" to the "Pending Marner Impasse" --the only one that was done quick and easy was Matthews--because they gave him the farm.
How come Pittsburgh never had these issues? Or the Caps? or the Bruins? Or even Edmonton with McDavid and Draisaitl? Even the Avs were able to keep their stars and add. Heck, look at Tampa--ALL of their stars took less to stay together (Stamkos, Hedman, Point, Kucherov, etc.)
The Leafs were the only club that saw the ugly business end become a narrative in their story. And, yes, it has a trickle down effect.
"Kids--now go out and earn all that money you demanded. Win a Cup, no excuses." It's human nature to react that way.