The ceiling of Brulé is miles ahead of him.Very easy, Brulé.
Some people want us to believe its close and talk about potential ceiling of Kostitsyn ?
This from a bruins fan
No Kostitsyn doesn't have the potential Brule does. Its as easy as that. Kostitsyn, best case scenario 2nd line winger, worse case (the more likely of the 2), he busts. I watched Kostitsyn last year and he was maybe the 4th or 5th best player on the Bulldogs last year. Jacques and Pouliot were hands down the best IMO. Brule has already had more success in the NHL, and he is 19, and has only played 7 total games of pro experience, where Kostitsyn has had 2 years of pro experience. I will say it now and I will say it again, Kostitsyn is nothing special, and won't ever be the player the Habs have hoped for. P.S, Talent Analysis, your probably the most biased fan on these boards, and you more than likely have only seen AK on t.v when he was with the Habs, he is just an enigma, Habs fans want him to be the ansewr sooo bad and they just can't live with the fact that he won't ever be the Superstar they hoped for.
Very easy, Brulé.
Some people want us to believe its close and talk about potential ceiling of Kostitsyn ?
I don't even really understand this part of it either. I saw every second of every shift he played for the Habs, and it wasn't "great"ness that I saw. He was invisible a couple games, he barely stepped on the ice in others, and in a few games that he did get a regular shift he was pretty decent, got off some nice shots. But all in all, we're still talking about 12 games, averaging 7 mins or so per game. Using the word "great" is asking for trouble. He did ok. Those wide open games against New Jersey and Pittsburgh were probably his best. Most of his recall was also during our most horrid stretch of the season when we got shelled in several games, and he got a bit of "mop-up" icetime in those games after the team had already been blown out of the water.
